Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tech is moving out of SF but DC will always have the federal government.
Yes but high earners left DC for Virginia and
Maryland and I don’t think federal workers can maintain DC to the same level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tech is moving out of SF but DC will always have the federal government.
Yes but high earners left DC for Virginia and
Maryland and I don’t think federal workers can maintain DC to the same level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
Translation - Wah, I can’t do what I want with other people’s stuff and the homeowners like living in the areas they live in. The nerve of those people wanting to enjoy the neighborhood as it is!
*tantrum*
Anonymous wrote:First, you do realize that real estate is subject to the laws of supply and demand. The reason both DC and San Francisco are so expensive to live in is because lots of wealthy people and other people want to live there! If no one wanted to pay high rents for those places, the rents would not be so high.
Second, SF ranks 40th among the top 50 cities for murder rate (in 2022 so don't tell me things have changed). Well below DC, so if we are headed in the direction of SF, it is the right direction! Of course SF's murder rate is well below such liberal bastions as Indianapolis, Nashville and Tulsa.
Third, for the above reasons (and many others) you should not believe what you see on TV about these things. There are homelessness issues in many places and there may be reasons it is more visible in some places, including SF. That is something that people of good will can try to address through policies. It is plain that retail in downtown areas is having issues, but those issues are arising in almost all cities with remote worker issues, including but not limited to DC. Again, those are things to work on. But generally, except for in the world of Fox News, SF remains one of the most desired (and rich) cities in the country (and one of the big cities where you are least likely to be murdered).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
The SFH streets throughout Ward 3 are gorgeous as ever, richer than they have ever been. Tons of investment and pride of ownership. Nothing 'tired' once you turn off Connecticut/Wisconsin/Mass Ave.
Few who are lucky enough to live as we do really care that FH development is taking forever or that the Cleveland Park commerce is raggedy. We uber to wherever we feel like dining and have everything delivered to us, anyway. And we're 10-20 years past the thrill of bar-going
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
Translation - Wah, I can’t do what I want with other people’s stuff and the homeowners like living in the areas they live in. The nerve of those people wanting to enjoy the neighborhood as it is!
*tantrum*
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These discussions about how an entire city are doing miss a lot of subtlety. In SF, like DC, the downtown business district is suffering but many of the outer neighborhoods are thriving with work from home. I've heard that many new businesses are opening in the Sunset (which had been a sleepier part of SF), and I'd guess places like Pacific Heights and Forest Hill are also thriving. In DC, Logan Circle and SW Waterfront are incredibly vibrant. Dupont and Upper NW seem tired, but that was true before COVID as well. Again, it's really the CBD that is suffering not the city as a whole.
Upper NW is tired because of the death grip from a bunch of homeowners who bought in the 80's and 90's and are riding the property value wave but wanting to "preserve the character" of the neighborhoods at all costs. Any change put forward is met with swift resistance.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, definitely if the Feds don’t return to work at least 3 days a week the hospitality industry will collapse and the tax base along with it. DC will be just like San Francisco in 2-3 years if work from home continues.