Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of baby showers, the woman-only kind where kids are not brought because the ladies are drinking and the both-sexes kind where everyone brings their kids. Personally I think it's more fun at the woman-only kind because the men are all sitting around awkwardly and you can't talk freely about birth, etc.
At a baby shower? The guest of honor can't drink, it's rude to drink right in front of her at a party honoring her!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women and moms deserve a break from their kids and have a kid free event.
Of course they do. A baby shower is not a fun kid free event. The food is always paltry, the entertainment is dismal, the activities suck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[list]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a two year old son. In the last two years I’ve been to several baby showers, and all of them have been child free events. Two of them said that they’d rather no babies because it wouldn’t be as fun for their mothers (lol, like watching the mother-to-be unwrap gifts and guessing how big her belly is with a ribbon is tremendous fun). The third specifically said that children are not invited. I wasn’t planning to bring my son (the shower falls during nap time) so I’m not offended, but I think this is strange! Am I wrong? Aren’t baby showers typically baby friendly?
Your two year old isn't a baby. A baby is different than a 2 year old toddler. No, they aren't always baby friendly and you have a toddler, not a baby.
I said that I’ve been to several in the last two years since he was born. I didn’t think I had to say both baby and toddler in the title for you to understand.
For those saying the hosts are probably tired of having children around, they were all hosted by the future grandmother. They don’t have small children and haven’t in decades.
Again, I didn’t plan on bringing my kid, but I think it’s very weird to celebrate a baby’s impending birth by banning other babies from attendance. A shower, which we all know is just a gift grab, really isn’t worth a sitter.
Then don't go.
You sound really self centered by the way.
Why self centered? I have no plan to bring my kid, I just think it’s bizarre to expect people to come to a party to celebrate a future baby and get sitters for their own. I hope those mothers don’t anticipate their children will be welcome at any of their friends’ parties anytime soon.
Like most people I know, I go because I have to. Does anyone enjoy baby showers? I truly can’t imagine why any adult would want to play the ridiculous shower games and watch presents be opened for an hour and a half.
Anonymous wrote:Women and moms deserve a break from their kids and have a kid free event.
Anonymous wrote:I brought my 7 year old daughter to a baby shower last month. The mother-to-be was my daughter’s babysitter and my daughter’s name was on the invitation. What’s the problem?
Anonymous wrote:I brought my 7 year old daughter to a baby shower last month. The mother-to-be was my daughter’s babysitter and my daughter’s name was on the invitation. What’s the problem?
Anonymous wrote:
I'm from a European country where kids are welcome everywhere, so I've never quite adjusted to this Anglo-Saxon concept of child-free events. I say Anglo-Saxon because it's the same in the UK, and some other English-speaking countries, not just the US.
On the other hand, having no babies at an event cuts down on the germ transmission, and it's true pregnant women have reduced immunity, so... consider it your sacrifice for the health of the mother to be.![]()
Anonymous wrote:[list]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a two year old son. In the last two years I’ve been to several baby showers, and all of them have been child free events. Two of them said that they’d rather no babies because it wouldn’t be as fun for their mothers (lol, like watching the mother-to-be unwrap gifts and guessing how big her belly is with a ribbon is tremendous fun). The third specifically said that children are not invited. I wasn’t planning to bring my son (the shower falls during nap time) so I’m not offended, but I think this is strange! Am I wrong? Aren’t baby showers typically baby friendly?
Your two year old isn't a baby. A baby is different than a 2 year old toddler. No, they aren't always baby friendly and you have a toddler, not a baby.
I said that I’ve been to several in the last two years since he was born. I didn’t think I had to say both baby and toddler in the title for you to understand.
For those saying the hosts are probably tired of having children around, they were all hosted by the future grandmother. They don’t have small children and haven’t in decades.
Again, I didn’t plan on bringing my kid, but I think it’s very weird to celebrate a baby’s impending birth by banning other babies from attendance. A shower, which we all know is just a gift grab, really isn’t worth a sitter.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm from a European country where kids are welcome everywhere, so I've never quite adjusted to this Anglo-Saxon concept of child-free events. I say Anglo-Saxon because it's the same in the UK, and some other English-speaking countries, not just the US.
On the other hand, having no babies at an event cuts down on the germ transmission, and it's true pregnant women have reduced immunity, so... consider it your sacrifice for the health of the mother to be.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
I'm from a European country where kids are welcome everywhere, so I've never quite adjusted to this Anglo-Saxon concept of child-free events. I say Anglo-Saxon because it's the same in the UK, and some other English-speaking countries, not just the US.
On the other hand, having no babies at an event cuts down on the germ transmission, and it's true pregnant women have reduced immunity, so... consider it your sacrifice for the health of the mother to be.![]()
Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of baby showers, the woman-only kind where kids are not brought because the ladies are drinking and the both-sexes kind where everyone brings their kids. Personally I think it's more fun at the woman-only kind because the men are all sitting around awkwardly and you can't talk freely about birth, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[list]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a two year old son. In the last two years I’ve been to several baby showers, and all of them have been child free events. Two of them said that they’d rather no babies because it wouldn’t be as fun for their mothers (lol, like watching the mother-to-be unwrap gifts and guessing how big her belly is with a ribbon is tremendous fun). The third specifically said that children are not invited. I wasn’t planning to bring my son (the shower falls during nap time) so I’m not offended, but I think this is strange! Am I wrong? Aren’t baby showers typically baby friendly?
Your two year old isn't a baby. A baby is different than a 2 year old toddler. No, they aren't always baby friendly and you have a toddler, not a baby.
I said that I’ve been to several in the last two years since he was born. I didn’t think I had to say both baby and toddler in the title for you to understand.
For those saying the hosts are probably tired of having children around, they were all hosted by the future grandmother. They don’t have small children and haven’t in decades.
Again, I didn’t plan on bringing my kid, but I think it’s very weird to celebrate a baby’s impending birth by banning other babies from attendance. A shower, which we all know is just a gift grab, really isn’t worth a sitter.
Then don't go.
You sound really self centered by the way.
Why self centered? I have no plan to bring my kid, I just think it’s bizarre to expect people to come to a party to celebrate a future baby and get sitters for their own. I hope those mothers don’t anticipate their children will be welcome at any of their friends’ parties anytime soon.
Like most people I know, I go because I have to. Does anyone enjoy baby showers? I truly can’t imagine why any adult would want to play the ridiculous shower games and watch presents be opened for an hour and a half.