Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you noticed anything interesting about your kid in the 10-14 years you have known the kids before the IQ test score came back?
Life matters a lot more than a quiz.
This. I'd understand the question more if your kid was 6, but he is in middle school. You already know your kid. My kid with a 147 IQ struggled as a young child with social stuff and relating to other kids, but now he is a pretty normal (though obviously very smart) middle schooler. He is prone to anxiety but currently that is under control, but, again, you'd already know this about your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Is his IQ profile pretty evenly distributed, or is he significantly higher in one area? Is his achievement level consistent with the IQ level? Does he seem socially well adjusted?
If his profile is uneven, then the easiest thing would be to keep him in a regular school, but supplement in the area of strength.
If he has a more even profile, I'd try to figure out why he doesn't seem to think he's bored. Is he just a very easygoing kid? Is he bored, but doesn't realize that school could be much more engaging and much faster paced? Is he happy to finish his work quickly, and then pursue one of his own interests?
If his achievement level is at best that of a normal smart kid, I'd look into additional evaluations. Very high IQ can mask LDs.
If he's struggling socially, keeping him in a normal school among normal kids will not help. He'll continue to feel like he doesn't fit in.
If he's sailing through school with no effort, then you need to make sure he's developing study skills and resilience from some activity. Having no study skills and expecting everything to be easy will eventually catch up with him and cause problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
I think the problem is that a kid with an IQ of about 150 to 165 will be an ordinary bright Top 30 university student, not all that amazingly bright by the standards of a selective university.
You have to figure out how to get your son into tough enough courses that, by the time he’s at college, he’ll know how to study and how to get help if he finds something confusing.
If he sails through K-12, that means he’ll end up in college with a weaker education than many other equally bright, better-educated students, and he may not have any idea of what to do in a class that’s hard.
This is an absurd statement. There are roughly 20 million people of college age in the U.S. 0.03 percent of that is 6000-- in the entire country, spread among all colleges. That would put an average of 200 kids of that intelligence at each of the top 30 colleges, or 50 per entering class. Hardly "ordinary"
Huh. Smart kids tend to congregate at smart schools. They are not evenly distributed.
Most kids at top ivies have IQs in the range that OP describes. Her son will almost certainly be average in college. If he’s lucky.
Anonymous wrote:Have you noticed anything interesting about your kid in the 10-14 years you have known the kids before the IQ test score came back?
Life matters a lot more than a quiz.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
My kid has incredibly high IQ and ADHD. The tester’s suggestion was to indulge his interests/passions but not really do much differently.
Why was your child tested? My two were tested because of learning disabilities.
I'm not sure if you're asking me (OP) or the PP. I have a friend who is a neuropsychologist and she was looking for someone for a new staff member to practice on. I had mentioned that I was curious about how he'd do so she offered. I didn't come in with concerns, and they didn't find anything problematic. Just lots of high scores.
I knew it would be higher than average going in. That's why I was curious. He's good at school. He's a very busy kid who is always doing something. But I had heard that profoundly gifted kids always struggle, and they need radically different things than their same age peers, and they are so much harder to parent than "typical" kids and since none of those things seem to apply to him, I sort of assumed he'd come in at the bottom of the gifted range.
But now, I'm worried that maybe he does need something different and I'm doing him a disservice?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
I think the problem is that a kid with an IQ of about 150 to 165 will be an ordinary bright Top 30 university student, not all that amazingly bright by the standards of a selective university.
You have to figure out how to get your son into tough enough courses that, by the time he’s at college, he’ll know how to study and how to get help if he finds something confusing.
If he sails through K-12, that means he’ll end up in college with a weaker education than many other equally bright, better-educated students, and he may not have any idea of what to do in a class that’s hard.
This is an absurd statement. There are roughly 20 million people of college age in the U.S. 0.03 percent of that is 6000-- in the entire country, spread among all colleges. That would put an average of 200 kids of that intelligence at each of the top 30 colleges, or 50 per entering class. Hardly "ordinary"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My IQ is 150+. I was in the gifted program in school, didnt do very well in school and went to GMU and then another local school for grad school. I cared a lot more about my social life than school. Have a good career now but Im not a rocket scientist or brain surgeon. I can do work more quickly than others and catch onto things easier than others, but otherwise, Im prob not the poster child for High IQ kids.
OP here,
Are you happy?
I don’t need some specific outcome other than happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That level of gifted needs to not be attending regular school. Way too boring for him. Most privates would be inappropriate too.
OP here,
He's in private but not one of the top privates, or one that people talk about as being particularly good for gifted kids. He followed an older sibling, because two different drop offs and pick ups seemed like it would be a pain.
He likes school, and never says "I was bored" about school, but he comes home from school with lots of pictures he's drawn and no homework and tells me "Oh we had free time in X class if we finished our work, so I did my homework there".