Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.
Wasn’t trolling. When you want something like a Wisc done, it’s best to do your research and find a good. When you go somewhere recommended by the county, they typically tend to go along with county agenda. It’s business and they want to keep an entity happy that’s bringing them revenue.
When you go to a university it’s a students passing through doing the exam and that’s not the same as a professional trying build a reputable business.
I was in a similar situation for one of my kids where the county recommended an outside WISC examiner named Ling in Reston. Guy was terrible and didn’t care about being accurate. He only wanted to make the county happy. I learned the hard way.
There are some good examiners out there like mindwell, Dr. Daisy, there’s a group in Maryland that starts with a W, and there are more. Just have to do your research, but going in the blind somewhere the county recommended is probably gonna be like asking the county what they think the Wisc is going to look like.
However, if you go somewhere not recommended by the county, they will usually ignore the result.
not true
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.
Wasn’t trolling. When you want something like a Wisc done, it’s best to do your research and find a good. When you go somewhere recommended by the county, they typically tend to go along with county agenda. It’s business and they want to keep an entity happy that’s bringing them revenue.
When you go to a university it’s a students passing through doing the exam and that’s not the same as a professional trying build a reputable business.
I was in a similar situation for one of my kids where the county recommended an outside WISC examiner named Ling in Reston. Guy was terrible and didn’t care about being accurate. He only wanted to make the county happy. I learned the hard way.
There are some good examiners out there like mindwell, Dr. Daisy, there’s a group in Maryland that starts with a W, and there are more. Just have to do your research, but going in the blind somewhere the county recommended is probably gonna be like asking the county what they think the Wisc is going to look like.
However, if you go somewhere not recommended by the county, they will usually ignore the result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.
Wasn’t trolling. When you want something like a Wisc done, it’s best to do your research and find a good. When you go somewhere recommended by the county, they typically tend to go along with county agenda. It’s business and they want to keep an entity happy that’s bringing them revenue.
When you go to a university it’s a students passing through doing the exam and that’s not the same as a professional trying build a reputable business.
I was in a similar situation for one of my kids where the county recommended an outside WISC examiner named Ling in Reston. Guy was terrible and didn’t care about being accurate. He only wanted to make the county happy. I learned the hard way.
There are some good examiners out there like mindwell, Dr. Daisy, there’s a group in Maryland that starts with a W, and there are more. Just have to do your research, but going in the blind somewhere the county recommended is probably gonna be like asking the county what they think the Wisc is going to look like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
What exactly is your evidence that this examiner was biased against your race/nationality? That’s a pretty intense charge. Were they wearing a shirt that said “Kill all (insert your race/nationality)? Did they say something like, “Oh not another (insert your race/nationality) kid.”
Do you work for GMU? I will not share details but like I said you know you are discriminated when you are discriminated. Yes, they don’t yell at you like, we don’t like X X and go back to your county. And I am not accusing the whole program and everyone there.
I don’t care you believe or not. Feel free to send your kids there. Enjoy your experience!
Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
What exactly is your evidence that this examiner was biased against your race/nationality? That’s a pretty intense charge. Were they wearing a shirt that said “Kill all (insert your race/nationality)? Did they say something like, “Oh not another (insert your race/nationality) kid.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
What exactly is your evidence that this examiner was biased against your race/nationality? That’s a pretty intense charge. Were they wearing a shirt that said “Kill all (insert your race/nationality)? Did they say something like, “Oh not another (insert your race/nationality) kid.”
Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
Anonymous wrote:I posted previous comment about GMU. I could not tell you details here but I am assure that our kid got low score because examiner purposely did that. I was confident that it was did because the examiner had discrimination based on our race/ nationality. Unfortunately, wether we can prove it does not matter because we could not take the test again within 12 months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.