Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't care if the whole world disagrees with me - as long as you have an adequate emergency fund and all the basics, I believe the correct answer is always pay off or pay down/recast your mortgage. You have no idea how freeing it is to not have a mortgage. Who cares if you end up with more money at age 65 the other way? I get to love life now at 41.
This is such a stupid way of thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would pay off my house if the $300k was enough to do so. I would not squander the money on expensive renovations and travel as other posters have suggested. If your house is paid off you can have more flexibility and/or more cash flow to do those things.
I wouldn’t pay off my house because 300K wouldn’t come close to paying off the mortgage nor would it significantly reduce payments. Our house is worth quite a bit and it’s nice but the kitchen is old and literally falling apart, so it would increase the sale price of the house at least a little. And then, you know, we would have a nice kitchen.
The worth of travel increases in value as time goes on, so that is a big boost in your quality of life. Im not extravagant when I travel, but I wouldn’t put that off until I was in the perfect financial situation. You never know, you could get MS or something and not be able to travel later on. Memories are important.
This is all to say that the “best” thing to spend the money on is going to be different for everyone!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't care if the whole world disagrees with me - as long as you have an adequate emergency fund and all the basics, I believe the correct answer is always pay off or pay down/recast your mortgage. You have no idea how freeing it is to not have a mortgage. Who cares if you end up with more money at age 65 the other way? I get to love life now at 41.
Totally agree. I'm 47 and my spouse is 58. He paid off our house 2 years ago. We have no other debt. I invest most of my earned income in stocks/index funds, max 401K, dividend income. I can quit my job anytime and not have to work for months before I would start drawing from savings. It is a good feeling.
See, here’s the thing. Some of us can pay off our mortgage tomorrow and choose not to. That’s equally freeing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't care if the whole world disagrees with me - as long as you have an adequate emergency fund and all the basics, I believe the correct answer is always pay off or pay down/recast your mortgage. You have no idea how freeing it is to not have a mortgage. Who cares if you end up with more money at age 65 the other way? I get to love life now at 41.
Totally agree. I'm 47 and my spouse is 58. He paid off our house 2 years ago. We have no other debt. I invest most of my earned income in stocks/index funds, max 401K, dividend income. I can quit my job anytime and not have to work for months before I would start drawing from savings. It is a good feeling.
Anonymous wrote:I don't care if the whole world disagrees with me - as long as you have an adequate emergency fund and all the basics, I believe the correct answer is always pay off or pay down/recast your mortgage. You have no idea how freeing it is to not have a mortgage. Who cares if you end up with more money at age 65 the other way? I get to love life now at 41.
Anonymous wrote:I don't care if the whole world disagrees with me - as long as you have an adequate emergency fund and all the basics, I believe the correct answer is always pay off or pay down/recast your mortgage. You have no idea how freeing it is to not have a mortgage. Who cares if you end up with more money at age 65 the other way? I get to love life now at 41.
Anonymous wrote:I would pay off my house if the $300k was enough to do so. I would not squander the money on expensive renovations and travel as other posters have suggested. If your house is paid off you can have more flexibility and/or more cash flow to do those things.
Anonymous wrote:hookers and blow