Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My niece's BF graduated grad school today. She graduated an year early as he took a gap year. BF's family was very nice but didn't include her in any family pics.
It was odd and rude as they are very committed to each other, rent a condo together, moving to same town for jobs and planning a future together. She clearly felt awkward, BF being a men was clueless.
Obviously people avoid adding anyone to family pics until married but one can always take some extra ones. Its surprisingly how thoughtless people can be and then they question why DIL keeps her distance.
They probably won’t last, while the images will. Prudent on the part of the family.
Pictures are to capture present, not predict future.
Anonymous wrote:Family only! She is NoT family
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Family" means different things to different people. My in-laws don't include extras in the family photo until they are married. I spent Christmas with his family while we were engaged - just a few months shy of our wedding - and I'm not in that family photo. I am in the one from the following year. My in-laws are wonderful people, we get along great, they are warm and loving and welcoming. But their tradition is that the "family photo" is ... just family. It's a clear line, nobody has to wonder who "counts" or worry that one kid's SO is being treated differently from another's.
In other words, the photo thing is only a big deal if you are reading more into it than just the photo.
That is beyond bizarre that your ILs didn't allow their son's fiancee in the family photo.
My SIL had a broken engagement and the fiancée is in all of the pictures of our kids baptism. It’s kinda weird now cuz he is literally just some random guy in the pics
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Family" means different things to different people. My in-laws don't include extras in the family photo until they are married. I spent Christmas with his family while we were engaged - just a few months shy of our wedding - and I'm not in that family photo. I am in the one from the following year. My in-laws are wonderful people, we get along great, they are warm and loving and welcoming. But their tradition is that the "family photo" is ... just family. It's a clear line, nobody has to wonder who "counts" or worry that one kid's SO is being treated differently from another's.
In other words, the photo thing is only a big deal if you are reading more into it than just the photo.
That is beyond bizarre that your ILs didn't allow their son's fiancee in the family photo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha ha when one of our daughters got married our younger daughter had a serious boyfriend. We took some photos with him and some without him that we joked were for “insurance” and he laughed along. They ended up getting married and we threw out the ones without him.
This is a good strategy. I know just as many couples that later broke up and the ex stands out like a sore thumb in the photos.
Anonymous wrote:Ha ha when one of our daughters got married our younger daughter had a serious boyfriend. We took some photos with him and some without him that we joked were for “insurance” and he laughed along. They ended up getting married and we threw out the ones without him.