Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Yes, so many social workers, doctors, nurses and therapists are chomping at the bit to live in bumf*ck nowhere to provide services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Completely wrong. We know that because of what happens when you build prisons in rural areas. The prisoners get released into those areas & wreak havoc.
Rural America does not want your failed policies. And they will make that very clear!
Rural America is already failed. And anything you want to "make clear" with your gun will land you in prison or 6 feet under.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Completely wrong. We know that because of what happens when you build prisons in rural areas. The prisoners get released into those areas & wreak havoc.
Rural America does not want your failed policies. And they will make that very clear!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Completely wrong. We know that because of what happens when you build prisons in rural areas. The prisoners get released into those areas & wreak havoc.
Rural America does not want your failed policies. And they will make that very clear!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Much cheaper to build and run a 1000 bed institution in rural America than in a city. And, most communities in rural America could use the jobs it would provide.
Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Agree, along with the homeless junkies and tweakers. Institutionalization, and if they are able to be cleaned up and rehabilitated, they can rejoin society.
But again, the reason this doesn't happen is because of Republicans and they lousy "no free sh*t for moochers" attitude.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
I do not support illegal immigration, but those citizens are mostly homeless due to mental health issues. The humane way to treat them would be institutionalization.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC already had a huge housing shortage, and hotels/shelters/other facilities are already over capacity. And to add capacity would be difficult, as DC is one of the most expensive places in the country, not to mention the massive amount of inertia in making anything happen - for example it's already been taking a decade plus to replace existing, ailing low-income housing like Greenleaf.
They should be sent somewhere that has cheap real estate and low cost of living but also capacity to build up services to support them.
Anything else would be a massively inefficient and wasteful use of what limited resources exist for dealing with it.
LOL. Your idea is to send them to areas where people live who voted precisely against Biden’s immigration agenda. Don’t worry, people in such areas tend to take self-defense into their own hands. Extrajudicial punishment. Rural residents will treat illegal aliens like the criminals they are.
Go right ahead and do that, and you can take the place of an illegal behind bars.
People who who would shoot someone for pulling into the wrong driveway would go to a war against illegals before they’d ever get near a prison.
So if they won't get near a prison I guess that means they instead plan to die in a shootout with police, because that's the only other alternative. Really, why does America indulge insane nutjobs like the American far right?
Where do you think police live? What do you think their political views are, on average?
Anonymous wrote:We have far too many homeless citizens in this country. Far too many.
Why are so many liberals so anxious to allow millions of migrants enter illegally into our country, then support them with housing and food, education, and medical services when we don't even do this for our homeless population?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC already had a huge housing shortage, and hotels/shelters/other facilities are already over capacity. And to add capacity would be difficult, as DC is one of the most expensive places in the country, not to mention the massive amount of inertia in making anything happen - for example it's already been taking a decade plus to replace existing, ailing low-income housing like Greenleaf.
They should be sent somewhere that has cheap real estate and low cost of living but also capacity to build up services to support them.
Anything else would be a massively inefficient and wasteful use of what limited resources exist for dealing with it.
LOL. Your idea is to send them to areas where people live who voted precisely against Biden’s immigration agenda. Don’t worry, people in such areas tend to take self-defense into their own hands. Extrajudicial punishment. Rural residents will treat illegal aliens like the criminals they are.
Go right ahead and do that, and you can take the place of an illegal behind bars.
People who who would shoot someone for pulling into the wrong driveway would go to a war against illegals before they’d ever get near a prison.
So if they won't get near a prison I guess that means they instead plan to die in a shootout with police, because that's the only other alternative. Really, why does America indulge insane nutjobs like the American far right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC already had a huge housing shortage, and hotels/shelters/other facilities are already over capacity. And to add capacity would be difficult, as DC is one of the most expensive places in the country, not to mention the massive amount of inertia in making anything happen - for example it's already been taking a decade plus to replace existing, ailing low-income housing like Greenleaf.
They should be sent somewhere that has cheap real estate and low cost of living but also capacity to build up services to support them.
Anything else would be a massively inefficient and wasteful use of what limited resources exist for dealing with it.
You think Detroit, Gary or Buffalo has the resources to support that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC already had a huge housing shortage, and hotels/shelters/other facilities are already over capacity. And to add capacity would be difficult, as DC is one of the most expensive places in the country, not to mention the massive amount of inertia in making anything happen - for example it's already been taking a decade plus to replace existing, ailing low-income housing like Greenleaf.
They should be sent somewhere that has cheap real estate and low cost of living but also capacity to build up services to support them.
Anything else would be a massively inefficient and wasteful use of what limited resources exist for dealing with it.
LOL. Your idea is to send them to areas where people live who voted precisely against Biden’s immigration agenda. Don’t worry, people in such areas tend to take self-defense into their own hands. Extrajudicial punishment. Rural residents will treat illegal aliens like the criminals they are.
Go right ahead and do that, and you can take the place of an illegal behind bars.
People who who would shoot someone for pulling into the wrong driveway would go to a war against illegals before they’d ever get near a prison.