Anonymous wrote:I’m an English major. Very content at 40 to be making $150K in a communications field, writing a lot, leaving every day at 4. My work is wonderful, and it never comes home with me. I’m sure I could be making a lot more money, but I value peace of mind and meaningful work a lot more. I’m happy!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is also less obvious about an English major is that it also teaches one how to be empathetic and how to interact with others no matter the situation.
Empathy is what always comes to mind when I am thinking about Norman Mailer....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know. My Dh majored in English and is earning over half a million + in the tv and film industry as are several of our contemporaries.
What in the article runs contrary to what you've written here?
Anonymous wrote:What is also less obvious about an English major is that it also teaches one how to be empathetic and how to interact with others no matter the situation.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know. My Dh majored in English and is earning over half a million + in the tv and film industry as are several of our contemporaries.
Anonymous wrote:I think school prestige is really important if you’re majoring in a “soft” subject. Doesn’t matter as much in STEM. But if your only option for college is Radford, I wouldn’t major in a “soft subject.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think what people who look down at English majors are missing is that there is so much you can do with that major. It is not limited to publishing. It is a flexible degree and you need to keep an open mind.
+1.
Anonymous wrote:I think what people who look down at English majors are missing is that there is so much you can do with that major. It is not limited to publishing. It is a flexible degree and you need to keep an open mind.
Anonymous wrote:This is very misleading. The only people who study English at college are rich people with family money. Of course they do well over time with connections etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/business/liberal-arts-stem-salaries.html
College is not trade school! What you make starting out isn’t very relevant. Think long-term.
STEM majors aren’t in “trade school”.They are as highly educated as their humanities peers and have as many options for flexible career shifts long term.
Also, while salaries may eventually equal out, that fast start allows STEM majors to pay off loans quickly, save to pay cash for a car, and save for a down payment on a house. Compound interest and early investment in the stock market is a wonderful thing for retirement.
This! The VAST MAJORITY of STEM kids are smarter/more intelligent than the VAST MAJORITY of English grads. The only smart kids that WANT to get an English degree are those that love English or are getting an 'easy' degree for a high GPA as a stepping stone to grad school (medicine, law or MBA). The first group will score high on job/career satisfaction and the latter, of course, will make money compared to a CS grad that didn't go to grad school. A third group will just coast on family connections.. Get into a decent school, study English or something equally fu fu, get a job with daddy's company or daddy's friend's and go up the ladder. The skills needed for a high level job are less cerebral and more interpersonal. I know someone who dropped out of college (English major) who 20 years later is the COO of a large company in another country (daddy's connections) and seems to be doing well (anecdotal, of course). I also know many, many STEM grads that decided to get an MBA and are rubbing shoulders with the C Suite.
If you were to measure the collective wealth of ALL STEM undergrads and compare that to ALL liberal arts grads adjusted for college pedigree, I bet the the STEM grads would be way ahead of the LA peers at any age group. Common sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/business/liberal-arts-stem-salaries.html
College is not trade school! What you make starting out isn’t very relevant. Think long-term.
STEM majors aren’t in “trade school”.They are as highly educated as their humanities peers and have as many options for flexible career shifts long term.
Also, while salaries may eventually equal out, that fast start allows STEM majors to pay off loans quickly, save to pay cash for a car, and save for a down payment on a house. Compound interest and early investment in the stock market is a wonderful thing for retirement.
Which STEM majors are you referring to? I hope not biology, chemistry, botany, ecology, zoology or environmental science.
Not sure where accounting, finance, supply chain and MIS fit neatly into the STEM vs non-STEM debate (assuming the person majored in one of those subjects in undergrad; not talking about the sociology major from Harvard who made it into Wall Street).