Anonymous wrote:I've never seen these, or the final wills threads, as being about the money. You never see these OPs saying "I really want that money. I need the money." Because it not usually about that. It's about the meaning behind the money and what it communicates to all of the parties involved. It's such a simplistic way of looking at family dynamics to say "they can spend their money however they want, you're not entitled to it." Thinking another way - all of you would be OK with one niece from a sibling getting money from a will, one nephew from another sibling getting money from a will, and your child being left out. You're telling me that would be OK with you? That would sting, on your child's behalf? That's all people are reacting to - that sting of not being treated in a way that says "I love you, too."
Agree. It’s the underlying feeling of being left out that hurts. Of course there can be extenuating circumstances. If OP’s brother were severely disabled and would never be able to support himself, it could make sense if the parents created a trust for him. But I would hope there would have been family discussions around this so siblings understand the reasoning and it has nothing to do with familial love. I imagine that would take the sting out of it. But OP’s brother has 2 masters degrees and is capable of living alone so that doesn’t seem to be the case.