Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.
They’ve got great facilities.
Oh wait, you meant fewer poors.
It isn't poor people I object to. It's 93% of kids behind grade level and a culture of low expectations perpetuated by people like you who refuse to demand more. I don't want my kid in classes with kids behind grade level. I don't want my kid in a school with kids that cannot behave. I don't want my kids in schools where people like you think demanding academic excellence is "racist".
By all means, continue to win your little faux equity battle while kids with options whom you resent find alternatives and POC without options are failed for yet another generation. That'll teach me!
Anonymous wrote:+1000!!!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.
They’ve got great facilities.
Oh wait, you meant fewer poors.
It isn't poor people I object to. It's 93% of kids behind grade level and a culture of low expectations perpetuated by people like you who refuse to demand more. I don't want my kid in classes with kids behind grade level. I don't want my kid in a school with kids that cannot behave. I don't want my kids in schools where people like you think demanding academic excellence is "racist".
By all means, continue to win your little faux equity battle while kids with options whom you resent find alternatives and POC without options are failed for yet another generation. That'll teach me!
Anonymous wrote:How many years would you give MHS to prove whether or not they are performing well? When will the data speak for itself?
+1000!!!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.
They’ve got great facilities.
Oh wait, you meant fewer poors.
It isn't poor people I object to. It's 93% of kids behind grade level and a culture of low expectations perpetuated by people like you who refuse to demand more. I don't want my kid in classes with kids behind grade level. I don't want my kid in a school with kids that cannot behave. I don't want my kids in schools where people like you think demanding academic excellence is "racist".
By all means, continue to win your little faux equity battle while kids with options whom you resent find alternatives and POC without options are failed for yet another generation. That'll teach me!
Anonymous wrote:JR is fine but crowded. Capitol Hill just needs to attend its in bound schools en masse. I know that is not at all an answer if your child is approaching high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The principal at MacArthur seems to be the real deal and based on what I am hearing, the educators he has hired have great reputations as well. I would be highly concerned with a new school however it appears MacArthur is being built on a solid foundation of teachers, admin and course offerings to make it competitive.
NP with no horse in the JR vs MHS race. But my lord people. How can you be drinking the Kool-Aid when it hadn't even been poured yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.
They’ve got great facilities.
Oh wait, you meant fewer poors.
So easy to say from Upper NW. Not an answer ever.Anonymous wrote:JR is fine but crowded. Capitol Hill just needs to attend its in bound schools en masse. I know that is not at all an answer if your child is approaching high school.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone I know from Hardy is going to MacArthur and I know a bunch of people at JR moving over to MacArthur as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.
Why absurd? In the 80s, 90s and early 2000s dozens of SES Cap Hill teens lotteried into Wilson annually. In fact, our block near the Capitol Hill South Metro station (D St, 2nd St.) was zoned for Wilson from the mid 80s until 2014. Some of us were cautiously optimistic that there would be room for some Cap Hill students at MacArthur this fall. But very few seem to have made the 9th grade lottery cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Really? Same old story, Capitol Hill gets the short end of the stick on DC public high schools.Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is wrong. As of my latest data point, 2/3 of Hardy students choosing between JR and MHS choose MHS.
All "lottery seats" were matched with students attending Deal and Oyster. So the student body will be Hardy/Deal/Oyster almost exclusively.
Capitol Hill deserves better by-right HSs. But the idea that Macarthur would be part of the CH solution is absurd.