Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These shootings are the fault of Republican voters. Republican voters keep voting for sociopaths who don't care about children being shot in the face.
Own it. It's on you.
Then democrats should double down on efforts to pass gun control legislation. Y'all are telling me they tried ONCE and gave up.
This is not the behavior of serious people. Most people understand that you have to persevere, compromise, push, etc. Not give up and explain how you can't because Republicans won't let you. And if that's the case, step aside and let new democrats or a third party with more energy and vision step up to get something done.
Look, I know there are people trying every damn day. Rs are absolutely the roadblock. With all their dirty NRA money
Then they aren't effective at their jobs. It's that simple.
Yell at the Rs to do something
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These shootings are the fault of Republican voters. Republican voters keep voting for sociopaths who don't care about children being shot in the face.
Own it. It's on you.
Then democrats should double down on efforts to pass gun control legislation. Y'all are telling me they tried ONCE and gave up.
This is not the behavior of serious people. Most people understand that you have to persevere, compromise, push, etc. Not give up and explain how you can't because Republicans won't let you. And if that's the case, step aside and let new democrats or a third party with more energy and vision step up to get something done.
Look, I know there are people trying every damn day. Rs are absolutely the roadblock. With all their dirty NRA money
Then they aren't effective at their jobs. It's that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These shootings are the fault of Republican voters. Republican voters keep voting for sociopaths who don't care about children being shot in the face.
Own it. It's on you.
Then democrats should double down on efforts to pass gun control legislation. Y'all are telling me they tried ONCE and gave up.
This is not the behavior of serious people. Most people understand that you have to persevere, compromise, push, etc. Not give up and explain how you can't because Republicans won't let you. And if that's the case, step aside and let new democrats or a third party with more energy and vision step up to get something done.
Look, I know there are people trying every damn day. Rs are absolutely the roadblock. With all their dirty NRA money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Reducing funding” as far as I understand it (and I sat through a 3 hour candidate forum yesterday afternoon where this came up) is more about trying to involve mental health professionals in the huge percentage of calls where that is what is needed vs police coming in to arrest people.
Crime is escalating out of control. We don't have enough mental health professionals in the world to contain the problem. This is not a viable plan and EVERYONE knows that.
No one said cut all police funding. It is more about trying to balance funding a little.
Rs love to talk about mental health yet put no dollars behind it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These shootings are the fault of Republican voters. Republican voters keep voting for sociopaths who don't care about children being shot in the face.
Own it. It's on you.
Then democrats should double down on efforts to pass gun control legislation. Y'all are telling me they tried ONCE and gave up.
This is not the behavior of serious people. Most people understand that you have to persevere, compromise, push, etc. Not give up and explain how you can't because Republicans won't let you. And if that's the case, step aside and let new democrats or a third party with more energy and vision step up to get something done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tried after Sandy Hook and failed.
Look, it is pretty much pointless until the Rs are willing to negotiate. Sinema and Manchin won’t kill the filibuster.
Any gun legislation would meet these roadblocks. It just is what it is.
Trust me, I hate this, but it is the absolute reality.
They tried one time, 11 years ago, and failed so they gave up.
Then why can't they pivot and offer something else to protect us? They are actually making things worse by reducing police and becoming more lenient ("prison reform"). Crime is going up, not down. If their only answer is to say, well, we tried once and failed, and now we are going to pull back all protections and let you all fight it out on the streets-- that is not a persuasive pitch to voters. Clean it up.
Give them control of the House and Senate and they will fix it. This is on voters.
Please. If they aren't introducing legislation now, you think they will later?
They need the house back AND 60 people in the Senate willing to vote for gun control OR a senate D majority willing to eliminate the filibuster
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Reducing funding” as far as I understand it (and I sat through a 3 hour candidate forum yesterday afternoon where this came up) is more about trying to involve mental health professionals in the huge percentage of calls where that is what is needed vs police coming in to arrest people.
Crime is escalating out of control. We don't have enough mental health professionals in the world to contain the problem. This is not a viable plan and EVERYONE knows that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tried after Sandy Hook and failed.
Look, it is pretty much pointless until the Rs are willing to negotiate. Sinema and Manchin won’t kill the filibuster.
Any gun legislation would meet these roadblocks. It just is what it is.
Trust me, I hate this, but it is the absolute reality.
They tried one time, 11 years ago, and failed so they gave up.
Then why can't they pivot and offer something else to protect us? They are actually making things worse by reducing police and becoming more lenient ("prison reform"). Crime is going up, not down. If their only answer is to say, well, we tried once and failed, and now we are going to pull back all protections and let you all fight it out on the streets-- that is not a persuasive pitch to voters. Clean it up.
Give them control of the House and Senate and they will fix it. This is on voters.
Please. If they aren't introducing legislation now, you think they will later?
Anonymous wrote:“Reducing funding” as far as I understand it (and I sat through a 3 hour candidate forum yesterday afternoon where this came up) is more about trying to involve mental health professionals in the huge percentage of calls where that is what is needed vs police coming in to arrest people.
Anonymous wrote:These shootings are the fault of Republican voters. Republican voters keep voting for sociopaths who don't care about children being shot in the face.
Own it. It's on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tried after Sandy Hook and failed.
Look, it is pretty much pointless until the Rs are willing to negotiate. Sinema and Manchin won’t kill the filibuster.
Any gun legislation would meet these roadblocks. It just is what it is.
Trust me, I hate this, but it is the absolute reality.
They tried one time, 11 years ago, and failed so they gave up.
Then why can't they pivot and offer something else to protect us? They are actually making things worse by reducing police and becoming more lenient ("prison reform"). Crime is going up, not down. If their only answer is to say, well, we tried once and failed, and now we are going to pull back all protections and let you all fight it out on the streets-- that is not a persuasive pitch to voters. Clean it up.
Give them control of the House and Senate and they will fix it. This is on voters.
Anonymous wrote:Rs are the ones loosening gun restrictions
But sure, blame ending cash bail or whatever BS you’re on about
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tried after Sandy Hook and failed.
Look, it is pretty much pointless until the Rs are willing to negotiate. Sinema and Manchin won’t kill the filibuster.
Any gun legislation would meet these roadblocks. It just is what it is.
Trust me, I hate this, but it is the absolute reality.
They tried one time, 11 years ago, and failed so they gave up.
Then why can't they pivot and offer something else to protect us? They are actually making things worse by reducing police and becoming more lenient ("prison reform"). Crime is going up, not down. If their only answer is to say, well, we tried once and failed, and now we are going to pull back all protections and let you all fight it out on the streets-- that is not a persuasive pitch to voters. Clean it up.