Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

You see Democrats for what they are? So you mean, demanding an ethical SCOTUS? I support that.

Democrats aren't the ones delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, the SCOTUS majority is doing that THEMSELVES. Wake the F up.

Yeah. You are.
With ridiculous hit pieces and false charges.
Your rhetoric and your false accusations are going to prompt another LWNJ to try to assassinate one of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Merrick Garland.

How do you get more transparent than Mitch McConnell allowing the Merrick Garland confirmation vote?

They can't. They are all whining about the "unfairness" of their quack justices being exposed for what they are. Corrupt. And several in place who never should have been confirmed in the first place. But oooohhhh it's the Deeeeeeemmmmmssss.

Anonymous wrote:We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

You see Democrats for what they are? So you mean, demanding an ethical SCOTUS? I support that.

Democrats aren't the ones delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, the SCOTUS majority is doing that THEMSELVES. Wake the F up.

Anonymous wrote:

These hit pieces have become comical.

Federal judges are *encouraged* to teach.

Including specifically by the federal judicial ethics rules.

Justices Thomas, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh all taught at George Mason Law.

A DC-area public law school on the rise.

Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Rehnquist, Roberts, Scalia, Sotomayor, and Stevens also all taught at law schools.

And yes, gasp, even overseas.

Great for George Mason Law students.

Green Berets, fighter pilots, naval and Coast Guard officers, CIA analysts, and other very serious students.

Oftentimes pursuing their second careers in the law.

Getting Supreme Court justices to teach is a very unique opportunity.

Wait-list every year.

Helps secure coveted federal clerkships.

Key mentorships for life.

Great for law school.

Meteoric rise in rankings.

Great for the justices.

Longtime law-school professors.

Love being in the classroom.

Especially with the extraordinary George Mason law students.

The roughly $30-$40k these justices receive for salary and travel expenses is well worth it to the school.

And preparing for, teaching, and grading these courses is a tremendous amount of work for the justices.

Especially for a highly compressed two-week program.

So it is laughable the New York Times published this dud of a hit piece.

It fails to mention until the 20th paragraph, of course, Justice Kagan also teaches at George Mason Law with the conservative justices.

And Justice Sotomayor also lectures at this public law school.

Game over.

And the piece quotes Amanda Frost, an immigration law professor at a rival Virginia public law school (University of Virginia).

For her flatly incorrect opinion on the legal ethics of all of this.

There is absolutely nothing wrong here.

Quite the opposite.

Again, the ethics rules *encourage* federal judges to teach.

But no good deed goes unpunished at the New York Times.

Of Note:

The New York Times piece also fails to mention a couple other things about Amanda Frost, its "ethics expert."

Whose "ethics opinion" is flatly wrong.

Amanda Frost was a former Democrat political staffer on the Senate Judiciary Committee for Ted Kennedy.

And a longtime leftwing activist and litigator at Public Citizen.

Oops.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

Bingo. So sick of these constant, pathetic lies from the left.

Facts are facts. Please cite an equivalent situation to Justice Thomas. He really is corrupt!!

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Merrick Garland.

How do you get more transparent than Mitch McConnell allowing the Merrick Garland confirmation vote?

Anonymous wrote:

And, we still need to know who paid off Kavanaugh's debts

Adding this to the pile because I had already forgotten about this Chertoff BS.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1652204510150811650.html

So let’s do a quick recap of the #IniquitousSix that currently hold the majority on SCOTUS to really get a clear picture of just how big of a dumpster-fire of corruption and illegitimacy the highest court of the nation has become (Thread)
1.) Clarence Thomas
—Accepted luxury vacations and gifts from a Nazi billionaire for the past 20 years in exchange for votes in his favor before the court
—Worked with his wife to overturn the 2020 election via the January 6th insurrection and organizing groups to lobby Congress
Unroll available on Thread Reader
2.) John Roberts
—Wife made $10.3 million from law firms that, “were likely appearing or seeking to appear before the court.”
—Has gutted the Voting Rights Act, ending preclearance requirements for laws limiting voting access on the basis of race/color
Unroll available on Thread Reader
3.) Brett Kavanaugh
—Credibly accused of rape at his confirmation hearing, screamed he liked beer, and cried
—Still no public information on why Kennedy abruptly retired, who paid off his mortgage as well as hundreds of thousands of debt and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat
4.) Neil Gorsuch
—Didn’t disclose who bought property he co-owned just days after his confirmation. The buyer was a lawyer whose firm has had “robust” business before the court—at least 22 cases since the deal, Politico reported.
Neil Gorsuch property deal adds scrutiny following Clarence Thomas scandal
Thomas has some company, but not much competition, when it comes to keeping information from the public.
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/neil-gorsuch-property-clarence-thomas-rcna81334
5.) Samuel Alito
—Leaked the Dobbs case and the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision to the public via a “stealth missionary”
—Aided Roberts in his crusade to gut the VRA
—Wrote the majority opinion to unconstitutionally overturn Roe and strip over 167 million Americans of bodily autonomy
Unroll available on Thread Reader
6.) Amy Coney Barrett
—Never tried a single case
—Served as a “handmaid” for ‘the People of Praise’, a small religious community founded in South Bend, Indiana in 1971 that opposes abortion and touts a ‘conservative approach to gender & family structures.’
What Does It Mean That Amy Coney Barrett Served As A ‘Handmaid’ In A Religious Group?
Trump’s Supreme Court nominee served as a “handmaid” in a close-knit religious community in South Bend, Indiana.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/10/07/what-does-it-mean-that-amy-coney-barrett-served-as-a-handmaid-in-a-religious-group/
Two of these appointments were seats STOLEN from Democrats. McConnell blocked President Obama from replacing Scalia for 330 days because it “was an election year,” then he rammed through Amy Coney Barrett to replace RBG while the 2020 election HAD ALREADY STARTED.
5 of them were appointed by Presidents who lost the popular vote yet managed to “win” via the electoral college.

3 of them were appointed by a traitorous criminal who was never legitimately elected & only obtained “victory” by conspiring with our enemies to attack our election
And ALL OF THEM LIED in their confirmation hearings when asked about their position on Roe and Casey as important judicial precedent that should not be overturned. If you lie in a regular job interview, you get fired. This is THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE U.S.
Meanwhile, the Justices are the only judges in America who aren’t bound to a code of ethics and ‘Chief Justice’ John Roberts refuses to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee to address the growing scandals swirling around his illegitimate court.
Chief Justice John Roberts will not testify before Congress about Supreme Court ethics | CNN Politics
https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/25/politics/john-roberts-congress-supreme-court-ethics/index.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Kagan and Sotomayor are both single. Brown Jackson’s husband is a surgeon.

Wow. Didn’t realize they don’t have parents, siblings, significant other or close relationships with anyone. Have they always slept in their offices wearing their robes?

The investigations reported have involved the justices themselves and/or their spouses. If you want to find out something about Sotomayor’s grandniece or Kagan’s uncle, do go ahead.

So is this the solution? Only put up people with no family or close social relationships? I’m half serious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Kagan and Sotomayor are both single. Brown Jackson’s husband is a surgeon.

Wow. Didn’t realize they don’t have parents, siblings, significant other or close relationships with anyone. Have they always slept in their offices wearing their robes?

The investigations reported have involved the justices themselves and/or their spouses. If you want to find out something about Sotomayor’s grandniece or Kagan’s uncle, do go ahead.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Kagan and Sotomayor are both single. Brown Jackson’s husband is a surgeon.

Wow. Didn’t realize they don’t have parents, siblings, significant other or close relationships with anyone. Have they always slept in their offices wearing their robes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Oh you want to bring up Ginni helping to plan the insurrection?

Oh — I don’t support her or Thomaseither. As an independent though, I have to side-eye rundowns that only do an accounting of one side. I just don’t know where to find all the info while so many here are connected. Hard to believe all these people are as clean as driven Snow.