Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.
You sound bitter (and broke)!
There are nearly 4,000 accredited four-year colleges in the US. Getting 125 students (not all of them are great students—especially some of the lifers) into Top 50 schools is a high bar.
Why the dig at lifers. I hear this a lot on this forum and it’s just not backed up by data. Sounds like jealousy to me b/c you weren’t able to provide private for your kid for all 13 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.
You sound bitter (and broke)!
There are nearly 4,000 accredited four-year colleges in the US. Getting 125 students (not all of them are great students—especially some of the lifers) into Top 50 schools is a high bar.
Why the dig at lifers. I hear this a lot on this forum and it’s just not backed up by data. Sounds like jealousy to me b/c you weren’t able to provide private for your kid for all 13 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.
You sound bitter (and broke)!
There are nearly 4,000 accredited four-year colleges in the US. Getting 125 students (not all of them are great students—especially some of the lifers) into Top 50 schools is a high bar.
Why the dig at lifers. I hear this a lot on this forum and it’s just not backed up by data. Sounds like jealousy to me b/c you weren’t able to provide private for your kid for all 13 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.
You sound bitter (and broke)!
There are nearly 4,000 accredited four-year colleges in the US. Getting 125 students (not all of them are great students—especially some of the lifers) into Top 50 schools is a high bar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money and privilege still matter, absolutely shocking
Lol seriously. And the school already by and large screened out kids with learning differences.
That’s not true. Kids with learning differences are welcome if they chose to stay. It may not be the best idea as the workload is intense but they are not asked to leave. They are quite supportive of kids with learning disabilities actually.
Anonymous wrote:we know that there are many more Ivy legacies at the top privates than publics
Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money and privilege still matter, absolutely shocking
Lol seriously. And the school already by and large screened out kids with learning differences.
Anonymous wrote:Money and privilege still matter, absolutely shocking
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.
I'm having trouble understanding how these results are worth bragging about. You're paying all that money for, what, a 20 percent chance of Ivy admissions, which is an inflated number to start with because we know that there are many more Ivy legacies at the top privates than publics.
My kids weren't geniuses, but they were good students at solid but no tippy top public schools in the DMV. They all got into either UVA, William and Mary or both, and they all went to one or the other except for one who chose a top ten LAC instead. I don't think their going to a so-called Big 3 would have made a bit of a difference in their college admissions, and we saved a lot of money and remained a part of our local neighborhood in the process.
The idea that, standing alone, attending the Big 3 over a good public school in the DMV makes a big difference in college admissions has long been debunked.
I think the complaints were about admissions for unhooked kids.
Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for the kids at these schools who are average students and sensitive. It must be very difficult to be surrounded by such cutthroat, competitive classmates and their parents.
Anonymous wrote:I'm having trouble understanding how these results are worth bragging about. You're paying all that money for, what, a 20 percent chance of Ivy admissions, which is an inflated number to start with because we know that there are many more Ivy legacies at the top privates than publics.
My kids weren't geniuses, but they were good students at solid but no tippy top public schools in the DMV. They all got into either UVA, William and Mary or both, and they all went to one or the other except for one who chose a top ten LAC instead. I don't think their going to a so-called Big 3 would have made a bit of a difference in their college admissions, and we saved a lot of money and remained a part of our local neighborhood in the process.
The idea that, standing alone, attending the Big 3 over a good public school in the DMV makes a big difference in college admissions has long been debunked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
ok, 85-90% to top50?
If your source is instagram, only 60% seniors posted. Anyway, top50 is a low standard for a top private.