Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
I’m DP and we adopted internationally in 2000. I think 2000 was the pinnacle year of international adoptions in the U.S. I researched extensively back then and you could not adopt from Ireland back then unless the child was a relative. Certainly I’m no expert though. I would have loved to adopt from Ireland as we are 3/4 Irish. There were two Irish families we met in Russia who said it was difficult to impossible for them to adopt there. This is the first I’ve heard about the Robert’s adoption. Sounds fishy but maybe they are biologically related.
I think his land sale is fishy AF. We can’t continue to have ethically compromised people on the Supreme Court.
The Irish mother was flown to South America to give birth where the babies could be adopted by Americans or other non-Irish residents. This apparently is something that is done but is expensive and exclusive. Who paid for it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
I’m DP and we adopted internationally in 2000. I think 2000 was the pinnacle year of international adoptions in the U.S. I researched extensively back then and you could not adopt from Ireland back then unless the child was a relative. Certainly I’m no expert though. I would have loved to adopt from Ireland as we are 3/4 Irish. There were two Irish families we met in Russia who said it was difficult to impossible for them to adopt there. This is the first I’ve heard about the Robert’s adoption. Sounds fishy but maybe they are biologically related.
I think his land sale is fishy AF. We can’t continue to have ethically compromised people on the Supreme Court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
I’m DP and we adopted internationally in 2000. I think 2000 was the pinnacle year of international adoptions in the U.S. I researched extensively back then and you could not adopt from Ireland back then unless the child was a relative. Certainly I’m no expert though. I would have loved to adopt from Ireland as we are 3/4 Irish. There were two Irish families we met in Russia who said it was difficult to impossible for them to adopt there. This is the first I’ve heard about the Robert’s adoption. Sounds fishy but maybe they are biologically related.
I think his land sale is fishy AF. We can’t continue to have ethically compromised people on the Supreme Court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579
I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.
This.
And, it appears that the Politico story is a BS one by someone who does not understand an LLC.
Leftists need to run to the other end of the cruise ship now where another cause awaits![]()
Let’s just say that this “Ed Whelan” - “Edward Whelan is a Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and holds EPPC's Antonin Scalia Chair in Constitutional Studies.” - is obviously a bad judge of character. Republicans on the subject of Republicans are not to be trusted; they have shown that when it comes to judging their own they will enforce no ethics whatsoever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579
I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.
This.
And, it appears that the Politico story is a BS one by someone who does not understand an LLC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579
I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.
This.
And, it appears that the Politico story is a BS one by someone who does not understand an LLC.
Leftists need to run to the other end of the cruise ship now where another cause awaits![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
He broke Irish adoption laws. Breaking the law as a judge is not a good look.
I wonder why they couldn't adopt through normal channels?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579
I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.
This.
And, it appears that the Politico story is a BS one by someone who does not understand an LLC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579
I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.