Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are moving into the area with kids in grade school from DC. We'd like to stay as close to the city/jobs as possible. Curious why BCC is always ranking behind. Wondering how it can be so different then the others and what is it missing?
BCC can't compete with the W's. If anyone says otherwise, they're simply uninformed.
Anonymous wrote:We are moving into the area with kids in grade school from DC. We'd like to stay as close to the city/jobs as possible. Curious why BCC is always ranking behind. Wondering how it can be so different then the others and what is it missing?
Anonymous wrote:For some background, BCC in the 40s-60s was one of the top 5 high schools in the country year after year. By the 90s its reputation had dropped a number of notches as demographics changed and the school age population dropped. Its beautiful historic building was showing its age and was not well maintained. Implementing IB in the mid 90s alongside AP classes helped to boost the perception of the school. Then the school was substantially renovated. BCC’s reputation for the past 20 years has been on the upswing and the school grew in size. It is currently viewed as one of the best high schools in MCPS. To answer your question, Whitman HS is more uniformly wealthy so it appears better on some stats. The other W schools also have high percentages of Asian families in particular who moved to those districts specifically due to the schools’ high academic stats.
Anonymous wrote:...
OP your kids will be fine at all the schools you list. Just find a house you like in a neighborhood you like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:18:43 continued
Schools can be divided into 4 groups based on the number of AP and IB courses offered.
50 to 72 courses: Richard Montgomery, Bethesda Chevy Chase, Kennedy, Einstein
40 to 49 courses: Rockville, Springbrook, Seneca Valley, Watkins Mill
30 to 39 courses: Walter Johnson, Wootton, Whitman, Churchill, Quince Orchard, Poolesville
20 to 29 courses: Blair, Blake, Northwest, Clarksburg, Sherwood, Gaithersburg, Damascus, Magruder, Northwood, Paint Branch, Wheaton
Note that if you look in the detail they separate out the APs from IB offerings & BCC is still at the top. Might not account for the specific math offerings at Whitman but I know my kid did dual enrollment at MC & lots of their peers did as well.
OP coming from DCPS - all of MCPS has its issues but fwiw we moved from DC & had similar concerns (minimizing commute especially) & chose BCC over Whitman. We also prefer the tiny bit of diversity it offers over Whitman.
You are deliberately misunderstanding my post. BCC has way fewer AP courses than many other high schools, including WJ and WW. This is a fact borne out your own chart. IB course are NOT AT ALL the same as AP courses. In math, they are much lower-level. The IB is not as recognized by universities as AP courses. So it's entirely useless to lump the two together and claim that BCC another high schools have "more" courses.
You're comparing apples to oranges and generating confusion here. Talk about AP and IB separately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are deliberately misunderstanding my post. BCC has way fewer AP courses than many other high schools, including WJ and WW. This is a fact borne out your own chart. IB course are NOT AT ALL the same as AP courses. In math, they are much lower-level. The IB is not as recognized by universities as AP courses. So it's entirely useless to lump the two together and claim that BCC another high schools have "more" courses.
You're comparing apples to oranges and generating confusion here. Talk about AP and IB separately.
Because they're not AP courses?
Conversely, universities don't recognize AP courses as IB courses, because they're not IB courses!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at school decision outcomes. BCC does not do as well as Whitman if that is a point of the data you are interested in.
We will see how “better” Whitman truly ranks when it actually has a measurable FARMS rate after this redistricting.
Even if they adjust the boundary it will have minimal impact. There just aren't boatloads of high-FARMs near Whitman. Even if they managed to double Whitman's FARMS and that's a HUGE IF, it would have almost no impact and remain one of the lowest FARMS schools in the county.
But it would still cause Whitman to drop in ranking because the only reason it ranks high is because virtually no disadvantaged students attend that school. If the FARMS rate doubles, then Whitman will easily drop to #6 to #10 in Maryland and stay there.
Not PP you were responding to. We can all agree that poorer families means lesser academic achievement in general. This is just theoretical for Whitman, since there is earthly way for Whitman to increase FARMS rate measurably with any boundary change (no one wants busing, so that won't happen).
There already is busing. If you get school bus service, to a school that is not the nearest school, and you want to stay at that school, then you want busing.
You know what is meant by busing in this thread's context: using a bus to transport lower-income students from a location that geographically should not be within the cluster, for diversity purposes. Parents of all income levels are opposed to changing the boundaries to include more of that, because traffic is bad enough, no one wants their kid for long periods of time on a bus, and families want to feel close to their neighborhood school (some parents have no car, and don't want to trek across the county to get to school meetings).
We are not talking about busing to special programs, CES or magnets.