Anonymous wrote:How much of San Francisco’s housing problem was caused by unregulated foreign money in real estate. We need to stop selling our country to other countries and non-citizens.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sad that I haven't had a chance to take my kids to San Francisco or Chicago yet. No way in hell we'll be going anytime soon.
Anonymous wrote:The rest of the country needs to send SF money for taking the entire country’s homeless populations.
Those vagrants weren’t born in CA. SF needs to start shipping them back to the heartland or wherever they come from.
Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.
"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whole Foods in downtown has decided to close because of crime and vagrancy, and because the company can no longer guarantee the safety of its workers:
https://sfstandard.com/business/downtown-san-francisco-whole-foods-market-closing/
Starbucks has had to remove seats now because the homeless invading its stores:
https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/sf-castro-starbucks-seating-removed-17854447.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight
WFH is adding another whammy to the city, which is now expected to be in trouble with an $800M budget deficits:
https://sfstandard.com/politics/city-hall/san-franciscos-deficit-swells-to-780m-in-latest-sign-of-budget-distress/
Really said to see how SF style leadership has destroyed a once beautiful city that is falling into the pits of lawlessness and financial disaster. Mind-blowing how they can keep re-election the same over and over and over again when the results keep getting worse and worse and now and businesses are closing up shop and are fleeing. Why do so many other cities and voters continue to vote for politicians trying to run on a similar model like SF's politicians? It is scary how fast SF has declined.
Why do you care if you don't live there? I seriously don't care about the rural hellhole that most of the Republicans live in. You should do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Still sad that people would rather live in a liberal hellhole than where ever you live, OP? Housing prices don’t lie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.
"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.
Its unsafe. They need to do something about safety to clean it up so businesses can still do business there and people can live in the homes.
They HAVE done something: they defunded the SF police, like everyone should. Because of racism.
Yeah, let’s get rid of the police all together!!!!! Then let’s see what happens to crime!!!!! Do it San Fran.
Anonymous wrote:The rest of the country needs to send SF money for taking the entire country’s homeless populations.
Those vagrants weren’t born in CA. SF needs to start shipping them back to the heartland or wherever they come from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rest of the country needs to send SF money for taking the entire country’s homeless populations.
Those vagrants weren’t born in CA. SF needs to start shipping them back to the heartland or wherever they come from.
It's a free country. People are allowed to go wherever they want. No one owes SF anything. Vagrabys wouldn't go there in the first place is SF never condoned open drug use, severely punished quality of life crimes/stealing/etc., and didn't try to hand out a whole bunch of free stuff after taxing the crap outta productive citizens.