Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption has been sold as this "harmless" alternative to an unwanted pregnancy. Because in theory, the only person harmed was "the sinner" mother who got pregnant in less than ideal circumstances. So advertising it as a saving grace for the baby and new family has deep political undertones because some people don't mind harming women to save babies.
Is it really better to essentially auction off a baby for $10-$50k to a "stable" family than to invest that $10k-$50k into the birth mother's life and help her raise her own child? That's the question society should be asking.
+1000
Exactly
So, for those who were adopted in this time period, how do you look at your life now?
Anonymous wrote:Me too movement. Right?
Anyone woman involved in a job situation and was dependent upon that to survive was at the mercy of men.
Is that mental illness?
A teenage pregnancy which resulted in being banned from her fanily home. Was that mental illness?
2 17 year olds have sex and neither can support a baby while in high school, or college. Is that mental illness?
A relationship where the father refuses accountability leaving the mother on her own. Is that mental illness?
Women in the military, overpowered as a subordinate. Is she mentally ill?
Anonymous wrote:There are millions of babies literally stolen from families, mothers in other countries and sold to white married middle class parents here. Millions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship now with your adopted family, siblings, parents when they were alive or if they are still alive, and extended cousins, etc.?
As you are older now, how have you framed (or reframed, most likely) your life experience?
I was born in the early 80's and adopted. I'm still very close with my family (why wouldn't I be?). I don't understand your second question.
![]()
What with the eyeroll? Completely unhelpful. Use your words.
A lot of adult adoptees have trauma. I am surprised you’re not aware of that. High suicide rates, too.
As do kids who were raised in their bio families.
This sounds like a kind of "all lives matter" thing with you. This has nothing to do with all kids. This is one population of kids..
Actually, it is important to discuss.
Some kids who are placed for adoption are from families who have a genetic/family history of mental health issues/substance abuse so it's not surprising that you see it in the kids as well. If everything was perfect, they would probably not be placed.
We are talking about the baby scoop era where a lot of women were coerced into putting children up for adoption they might have otherwise aborted if they had access to safe and legal abortion or parented. There was a lot more secrecy and shame around adoption where adoptive parents wouldn't always tell their children that they were adopted or would keep it a big secret.
I recommend reading the book The girl who went away to understand more about this situation
I'm the earlier pp born in the 60s, who went to a private school. In addition to the two friends I knew who were adopted during the baby scoop era, one more found out she was adopted after her parents died and she went through the paperwork.
Oddly enough, in my sample of four baby scoop era adopted friends, she was the happiest, until she found out she was adopted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship now with your adopted family, siblings, parents when they were alive or if they are still alive, and extended cousins, etc.?
As you are older now, how have you framed (or reframed, most likely) your life experience?
I was born in the early 80's and adopted. I'm still very close with my family (why wouldn't I be?). I don't understand your second question.
![]()
What with the eyeroll? Completely unhelpful. Use your words.
A lot of adult adoptees have trauma. I am surprised you’re not aware of that. High suicide rates, too.
As do kids who were raised in their bio families.
This sounds like a kind of "all lives matter" thing with you. This has nothing to do with all kids. This is one population of kids..
Actually, it is important to discuss.
Some kids who are placed for adoption are from families who have a genetic/family history of mental health issues/substance abuse so it's not surprising that you see it in the kids as well. If everything was perfect, they would probably not be placed.
We are talking about the baby scoop era where a lot of women were coerced into putting children up for adoption they might have otherwise aborted if they had access to safe and legal abortion or parented. There was a lot more secrecy and shame around adoption where adoptive parents wouldn't always tell their children that they were adopted or would keep it a big secret.
I recommend reading the book The girl who went away to understand more about this situation
That's true,but the population that experienced an out of wedlock in an era when that was highly stigmatized were somewhat more likely to have mental health or substantive abuse challenges, as those make you more likely to engage in promiscuous behavior; less likely to use birth control (which was available then, although not as easily and not as many effective options); and less likely to have supportive family environments that would support them in single parenting (which was rare but not unheard of them) or support them in an early marriage (which was very common for unplanned pregnancy then). Not saying that all parents who gave up children were in that situation, but it is statistically more likely, and therefore statistically more likely that adopted children would suffer from some of these conditions as well. And that does even account for the fact that babies put up for adoption were somewhat more statistically likely to be the product of rape, which itself is correlated with certain mental health conditions and substance abuse problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship now with your adopted family, siblings, parents when they were alive or if they are still alive, and extended cousins, etc.?
As you are older now, how have you framed (or reframed, most likely) your life experience?
I was born in the early 80's and adopted. I'm still very close with my family (why wouldn't I be?). I don't understand your second question.
![]()
What with the eyeroll? Completely unhelpful. Use your words.
A lot of adult adoptees have trauma. I am surprised you’re not aware of that. High suicide rates, too.
As do kids who were raised in their bio families.
This sounds like a kind of "all lives matter" thing with you. This has nothing to do with all kids. This is one population of kids..
Actually, it is important to discuss.
Some kids who are placed for adoption are from families who have a genetic/family history of mental health issues/substance abuse so it's not surprising that you see it in the kids as well. If everything was perfect, they would probably not be placed.
We are talking about the baby scoop era where a lot of women were coerced into putting children up for adoption they might have otherwise aborted if they had access to safe and legal abortion or parented. There was a lot more secrecy and shame around adoption where adoptive parents wouldn't always tell their children that they were adopted or would keep it a big secret.
I recommend reading the book The girl who went away to understand more about this situation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship now with your adopted family, siblings, parents when they were alive or if they are still alive, and extended cousins, etc.?
As you are older now, how have you framed (or reframed, most likely) your life experience?
I was born in the early 80's and adopted. I'm still very close with my family (why wouldn't I be?). I don't understand your second question.
![]()
What with the eyeroll? Completely unhelpful. Use your words.
A lot of adult adoptees have trauma. I am surprised you’re not aware of that. High suicide rates, too.
As do kids who were raised in their bio families.
This sounds like a kind of "all lives matter" thing with you. This has nothing to do with all kids. This is one population of kids..
Actually, it is important to discuss.
Some kids who are placed for adoption are from families who have a genetic/family history of mental health issues/substance abuse so it's not surprising that you see it in the kids as well. If everything was perfect, they would probably not be placed.
We are talking about the baby scoop era where a lot of women were coerced into putting children up for adoption they might have otherwise aborted if they had access to safe and legal abortion or parented. There was a lot more secrecy and shame around adoption where adoptive parents wouldn't always tell their children that they were adopted or would keep it a big secret.
I recommend reading the book The girl who went away to understand more about this situation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we've entered a new era where open adoption will prove to have just as many heartbreaking challenges.
So many adoptions now are private and essentially a pay-for-service model. Go out and find a young or poor woman who may/may not want to keep their child, offer them cold hard cash for "living expenses" and promise they will be an integral part of the child's life.
Maybe the adoptive parents will keep that promise maybe they won't. We all know now that open agreements are usually not enforceable.
You may have a child who has grown up WITH their bio parents as part of their life. Then they reach a stage where there may be conflict between the parents. The adoptive parents then decide to limit/cease contact with bio parents.
Even if there is no conflict, what is it like for these children to know their bio parents/families, but also know they were relinquished by them to be raised by others who are not in any way related?
What kind of non-biased psychological studies have looked at how these situations affect children? There are lots of pro-adoption organizations touting how wonderful open adoption is but I've not seen any non-biased studies done.
It depends on the state. If laws haven't changed, in MD you aren't allowed to pay birthmother expenses outside medical and legal. We didn't pay any birthmom expenses. We just paid attorney fees.
You make adoption sound so simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption has been sold as this "harmless" alternative to an unwanted pregnancy. Because in theory, the only person harmed was "the sinner" mother who got pregnant in less than ideal circumstances. So advertising it as a saving grace for the baby and new family has deep political undertones because some people don't mind harming women to save babies.
Is it really better to essentially auction off a baby for $10-$50k to a "stable" family than to invest that $10k-$50k into the birth mother's life and help her raise her own child? That's the question society should be asking.
Now it's a choice and there are supports to help her. Lots of government assistance. Some still don't or cannot parent.