Anonymous wrote:Surprised, but don’t disagree, that people seem more inclined to pay down the mortgage than dump it into stocks. Things have changed from a couple years ago!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to stay in your house at retirement and you cannot afford to pay the current mortgage amount once you retire, it seems like recasting the 200 is a good idea to lower the payment right? I’m not sure why people aren’t seeing it that way. Welcome someone clarifying.
I guess if they can’t afford bit could afford the new payment that would make sense, but it won’t shorten the loan period. They’d probably be better off putting it towards principal and being done with the loan sooner.
They could always recast and continue paying extra each month.
I am the recast poster. In their situation I would not do a lump sum. They don't have enough college or regular savings as they over spent on their house.
Their mortgage is roughly twice their HHI. I don’t think that is overspending in this area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, ignore the poster that said to put it in 529s. You already have 100k in each and need to think about your retirement first.
You left out some key details, such as how much you have remaining on your mortgage and the interest rate. If the 200k would pay off the mortgage or get you much closer to it such that it could be paid off in a few years, I would strongly consider sending it to the mortgage. If, however, the 200k would leave you with several hundred thousand left to pay off, especially if the interest rate was low, I would not send the money to the mortgage. Paying down a mortgage creates some liquidity risk (you still owe the bank the monthly payment every month for X decades) that is not present with paying off the mortgage in one fell swoop.
OP here. I included those items - it's 850k remaining balance, at 4.5%, with 28 years remaining. So putting 200k into it would knock it down almost by a quarter and lower our monthly payment by 1k and save us roughly 400k in interest over the life of the loan.
How is it going to knock 1000 off the payment? Are you planning to recast? Recasting will lower the monthly payment but not shorten the loan term.
If you recast, that helps with liquidity, in which case I think at 4.5%, sending it toward the mortgage is reasonable. A 4.5% AFTER TAX return in the max is not guaranteed and I think that is a lot of mortgage balance in your mid-40s.
Did everyone account for benefits of writing off interest on the mortgage/tax minimization effect of having the mortgage? It seems that stock market return would be better than prepaying the mortgage, as keeping mortgage allows for these write offs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it all or nothing? All in market, or all in mortgage?
OP here. That would seem to have the most impact, but I'm coming here for advice on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is 100k per child for a child under 10 not enough? It will continue to grow! I’d bet they are way ahead of most families.
They need 350k for each child to attend private. For the 9 year old they only have 9 years to go, compound interest will only get them
1/2 to 2/3 of the way there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is 100k per child for a child under 10 not enough? It will continue to grow! I’d bet they are way ahead of most families.
They need 350k for each child to attend private. For the 9 year old they only have 9 years to go, compound interest will only get them
1/2 to 2/3 of the way there
Anonymous wrote:How is 100k per child for a child under 10 not enough? It will continue to grow! I’d bet they are way ahead of most families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to stay in your house at retirement and you cannot afford to pay the current mortgage amount once you retire, it seems like recasting the 200 is a good idea to lower the payment right? I’m not sure why people aren’t seeing it that way. Welcome someone clarifying.
I guess if they can’t afford bit could afford the new payment that would make sense, but it won’t shorten the loan period. They’d probably be better off putting it towards principal and being done with the loan sooner.
They could always recast and continue paying extra each month.
I am the recast poster. In their situation I would not do a lump sum. They don't have enough college or regular savings as they over spent on their house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, ignore the poster that said to put it in 529s. You already have 100k in each and need to think about your retirement first.
You left out some key details, such as how much you have remaining on your mortgage and the interest rate. If the 200k would pay off the mortgage or get you much closer to it such that it could be paid off in a few years, I would strongly consider sending it to the mortgage. If, however, the 200k would leave you with several hundred thousand left to pay off, especially if the interest rate was low, I would not send the money to the mortgage. Paying down a mortgage creates some liquidity risk (you still owe the bank the monthly payment every month for X decades) that is not present with paying off the mortgage in one fell swoop.
OP here. I included those items - it's 850k remaining balance, at 4.5%, with 28 years remaining. So putting 200k into it would knock it down almost by a quarter and lower our monthly payment by 1k and save us roughly 400k in interest over the life of the loan.
How is it going to knock 1000 off the payment? Are you planning to recast? Recasting will lower the monthly payment but not shorten the loan term.
If you recast, that helps with liquidity, in which case I think at 4.5%, sending it toward the mortgage is reasonable. A 4.5% AFTER TAX return in the max is not guaranteed and I think that is a lot of mortgage balance in your mid-40s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to stay in your house at retirement and you cannot afford to pay the current mortgage amount once you retire, it seems like recasting the 200 is a good idea to lower the payment right? I’m not sure why people aren’t seeing it that way. Welcome someone clarifying.
I guess if they can’t afford bit could afford the new payment that would make sense, but it won’t shorten the loan period. They’d probably be better off putting it towards principal and being done with the loan sooner.
They could always recast and continue paying extra each month.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College and regular savings
How much into each? Why not the mortgage?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to stay in your house at retirement and you cannot afford to pay the current mortgage amount once you retire, it seems like recasting the 200 is a good idea to lower the payment right? I’m not sure why people aren’t seeing it that way. Welcome someone clarifying.
I guess if they can’t afford bit could afford the new payment that would make sense, but it won’t shorten the loan period. They’d probably be better off putting it towards principal and being done with the loan sooner.