Anonymous wrote:The urge to put down Elon tells us what we already know, Elon is on the rise and for some inexplicable reason people seem threatened by that.
Anonymous wrote:I think if OP genuinely doesn't care about the difference in prestige and selectivity (which is real) she'd probably be happier with Elon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Why are people so nasty about Elon?
They aren’t, they are just saying Richmond is much much better. It is. It’s not debatable. If op’s kid wants to go to Elon let them go to Elon. It’s a safety fkr many bottom 1/2 of class private school kids. Richmond is selective and full of very rich kids. Elon is more lower upper middle class.
I find your tone nasty and unnecessary. I bet you’re one of the Northeastern haters as well. You can make your point without being so rude and dismissive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Why are people so nasty about Elon?
They aren’t, they are just saying Richmond is much much better. It is. It’s not debatable. If op’s kid wants to go to Elon let them go to Elon. It’s a safety fkr many bottom 1/2 of class private school kids. Richmond is selective and full of very rich kids. Elon is more lower upper middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
I think Elon attracts kids with learning disabilities. These are smart kids who shine in areas other than tedious classroom academics.
Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Why are people so nasty about Elon?
They aren’t, they are just saying Richmond is much much better. It is. It’s not debatable. If op’s kid wants to go to Elon let them go to Elon. It’s a safety fkr many bottom 1/2 of class private school kids. Richmond is selective and full of very rich kids. Elon is more lower upper middle class.
What difference does class make and how do you know the socioeconomic demographic info?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Why are people so nasty about Elon?
They aren’t, they are just saying Richmond is much much better. It is. It’s not debatable. If op’s kid wants to go to Elon let them go to Elon. It’s a safety fkr many bottom 1/2 of class private school kids. Richmond is selective and full of very rich kids. Elon is more lower upper middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon’s 25th-75th percentile SAT range is 1175-1330. UR is 1410-1500. Are we done comparing apples and oranges?
The smartest kids at Elon would be the dumbest kids at Richmond, to be crude about it.
The last year test scores were required by either was 2019. According to the CDS from that year for each:
Elon's SAT ran from 1170-1330, which is 77th percentile to 93rd percentile. The median is around the 85th percentile.
Richmond's ran from 1300-1450, which is 91st to 99th percentile. The median is around the 95th percentile.
25% of Elon's students are therefore close to, at, or above the median at Richmond.
Also, speaking of comparing apples and oranges, the difference in intellectual capacity of the students at ANY two schools is nowhere near the same as that of the faculty. At Elon, 82% of the faculty have a PhD or other terminal degree. At Richmond, it's only 74%. How do you like them apples?
Same poster. My apologies. The numbers I gave for professors are totally wrong. It's 85% for Richmond vs. 77% for Elon. The test score numbers for students are correct, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon’s 25th-75th percentile SAT range is 1175-1330. UR is 1410-1500. Are we done comparing apples and oranges?
The smartest kids at Elon would be the dumbest kids at Richmond, to be crude about it.
The last year test scores were required by either was 2019. According to the CDS from that year for each:
Elon's SAT ran from 1170-1330, which is 77th percentile to 93rd percentile. The median is around the 85th percentile.
Richmond's ran from 1300-1450, which is 91st to 99th percentile. The median is around the 95th percentile.
25% of Elon's students are therefore close to, at, or above the median at Richmond.
Also, speaking of comparing apples and oranges, the difference in intellectual capacity of the students at ANY two schools is nowhere near the same as that of the faculty. At Elon, 82% of the faculty have a PhD or other terminal degree. At Richmond, it's only 74%. How do you like them apples?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elon is a school for rich kids not smart enough to get into someplace like Richmond. It’s not well respected by employers also boring. And yes I know several kids who attend.
Why are people so nasty about Elon?
Anonymous wrote:Elon’s 25th-75th percentile SAT range is 1175-1330. UR is 1410-1500. Are we done comparing apples and oranges?
The smartest kids at Elon would be the dumbest kids at Richmond, to be crude about it.