Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woodend, the estate home of Nature Forward (formerly the Audubon Naturalist Society). It can do 125 people. There's a nice grove where you can do the ceremony and bring in your priest/rabbi/other. It's lovely, it's not that expensive and guests will appreciate your commitment to nature and think that's why you chose it (and why not?).
The main reason not to is there’s no air conditioning. If you get a perfect night, yes, it’s lovely and not fussy. But I’ve seen a wedding there in May when it was 90 degrees and humid, and nobody was looking elegant. In Washington, you need at least a place people can retreat for a spell that is air conditioned.
The heat is a huge factor. No one wants to get married outdoors with an outdoor reception here June-September. Seriously, guests get heat exhaustion and your vendors get kidney damage. Don’t torture everyone. Pay the higher free for a venue with AC or for a cooler month.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woodend, the estate home of Nature Forward (formerly the Audubon Naturalist Society). It can do 125 people. There's a nice grove where you can do the ceremony and bring in your priest/rabbi/other. It's lovely, it's not that expensive and guests will appreciate your commitment to nature and think that's why you chose it (and why not?).
The main reason not to is there’s no air conditioning. If you get a perfect night, yes, it’s lovely and not fussy. But I’ve seen a wedding there in May when it was 90 degrees and humid, and nobody was looking elegant. In Washington, you need at least a place people can retreat for a spell that is air conditioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Park Hyatt or any other nice hotel.
No one wants to have a reception in the same hotel as their bah mitzvah party.
Anonymous wrote:A family property with acreage 1-2 hours away from DC.
Anonymous wrote:Woodend, the estate home of Nature Forward (formerly the Audubon Naturalist Society). It can do 125 people. There's a nice grove where you can do the ceremony and bring in your priest/rabbi/other. It's lovely, it's not that expensive and guests will appreciate your commitment to nature and think that's why you chose it (and why not?).
Anonymous wrote:Carnegie Institute
Anonymous wrote:Park Hyatt or any other nice hotel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have it at home, in their yard. Seriously, that’s one thing rich & LMC people both do.
Because wealthy people live in estate-level homes that are typically excellent wedding venues.
Poors have their weddings in the back yard because they have no other options.
They are NOT the same reasons.
Unless you live on estate or at least 3 acres AND have space to park 80-100 cars for 150 guests plus catering/hospitality staff, plus either a commercial grade and capacity kitchen (or room for a dozen hot racks) and parking for catering trucks, plus room for tents outside, power or space for generators to handle lighting and other needs, then you shouldn’t be having a wedding at home.