Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's optional, make a decision that makes you happy. Don't be afraid or pressured unless there is a clear policy asking you to mask.
+1 We were early adopters of not masking our child when they took the mandate away. We were not shunned by the community or the school. It was fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child abuse
Oh please.
Says the child abuser 👿
I am against toddler masking, but calling it child abuse is downright offensive and irresponsible.
Agree. It is rooted in good intentions. It's a very misguided choice, though
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child abuse
Oh please.
Says the child abuser 👿
I am against toddler masking, but calling it child abuse is downright offensive and irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child abuse
Oh please.
Says the child abuser 👿
I am against toddler masking, but calling it child abuse is downright offensive and irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child abuse
Oh please.
Says the child abuser 👿
Anonymous wrote:Including outdoors. But not for meals or napping.
It honestly only bothers me like... 10%. It's annoying because it is so out of sync with everything else and makes no sense - but it is not actually harming my particular child. The official policy is optional. When it finally switched to that in the last 6 months, there were a few days where classmates showed up without. It quickly reverted. The administration says no one is masking outside, but I see it every single day. It bothers me only on a scientific / "this makes no sense" level, not a "my child is harmed" level.
I swear we are the last classroom in the country doing this. I am inclined to just wait it out, but frustrated at the teachers pressure on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child abuse
Oh please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it was still in place next year I would pull them out and send to another. I would do that now if I could. There is no reason for this. And I have never been anti-mask.
You are anti mask.
Anonymous wrote:It actually is harmful to kids this young.
Ive talk to a couple preschool directors that have said it’s impacted their kids negatively to have masks on them.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It actually is harmful to kids this young.
Evidence?
Where is the evidence that drinking a glass of alcohol once a week during pregnancy is harmful? There isn't any, we just know that alcohol is toxic so many people discourage it.
We know that masks impact social interactions negatively https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.582191/full
We know that young children are in critical stages of development and that social skills are among if not the most important aspects of development at this age.
It's common sense that this might impact young children negatively, especially those who already struggle with their social development.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congratulations on raising a fearful child! Bravo!
Child is thoughtful and considerate.
How is wearing a mask outside thoughtful and considerate? It has zero impact on anyone what the child. They can do what they want, but let’s not pretend a preschooler masking outside somehow has superior morals to non-masking preschoolers. There’s something else going on.
OP have you asked why they are still masking outside?
We got covid outside at the pool.
Doubtful. One of you probably got it in the bathroom.