Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Playing with kids (especially toddlers) is so boring. He should put her in a childproofed room and let her explore while he does whatever in the same room.
Sorry, but that's sad. It's like he can't be bothered to engage with her. That is incredibly sad.
Neither DH nor I are kiddie people, but we both engaged with our kids when they were little, even if it's just reading to them, or as OP said, playing ball with them or blowing bubbles.
IMO, men like these can't be bothered to do something that they don't like with their kids. Sorry, but when you have children, you are signing up for a whole lot of "doing something I don't like".
Anonymous wrote:Meh. I didn’t enjoy playing with my kids. Playing with a 2 year old is not that fun. I preferred to take them somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:I never played with my kids when they were little either. My husband did though, he liked it. I would have them in the same room, playing, while I did other things. He can do that.
It is interesting, however, that so many people marry someone without observing how they would interact with babies and young children. Seems like a basic bit of info one ought to have before marrying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of men don't relate to little kids. Kids under 4 or 5. But he'll take a load off when the kid is a teen and you can't handle the kid.
This is a long road, OP. Don't force to play with a 2-year-old and he'll step in when the kid is older and you can't deal.
A lot of women don’t relate to little kids either. I don’t play with my kids at all.
Same, I don’t “play” with my kids. That is such new and weak parenting. I include them in things (engage), and help them get tools to play/color/etc. it is ridiculous to “play” all the time. Children love to be included on adult things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of men don't relate to little kids. Kids under 4 or 5. But he'll take a load off when the kid is a teen and you can't handle the kid.
This is a long road, OP. Don't force to play with a 2-year-old and he'll step in when the kid is older and you can't deal.
A lot of women don’t relate to little kids either. I don’t play with my kids at all.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of men don't relate to little kids. Kids under 4 or 5. But he'll take a load off when the kid is a teen and you can't handle the kid.
This is a long road, OP. Don't force to play with a 2-year-old and he'll step in when the kid is older and you can't deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Playing with kids (especially toddlers) is so boring. He should put her in a childproofed room and let her explore while he does whatever in the same room.
Sorry, but that's sad. It's like he can't be bothered to engage with her. That is incredibly sad.
Neither DH nor I are kiddie people, but we both engaged with our kids when they were little, even if it's just reading to them, or as OP said, playing ball with them or blowing bubbles.
IMO, men like these can't be bothered to do something that they don't like with their kids. Sorry, but when you have children, you are signing up for a whole lot of "doing something I don't like".
I disagree. I am a very involved parent. I didn’t play with my kids much. But I cooked with them and took them to the zoo and museums and help with homework every day and drive them everywhere and make all of their food and read them books. I am the Girl Scouts leader and room parent and soccer coach. But I rarely played with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s fine not to “play” meaning sitting on the floor making silly voices or pretending to eat play food.
BUT he should be able to supervise her while she is not contained in a high chair or stroller. Meaning, he’s actively paying attention to her, talking to her, and tending to her needs while SHE plays. It’s boring, yes, but required of parenting.
If he can’t do the second part, you have a problem.
+1 He doesn’t have to play but he should take her for walks, teach her to help with chores, supervise her on the playground, etc.