Anonymous wrote:make you think the person is extremely privileged? Especially if they’re white and/or male? I was surprised to hear that viewpoint from someone I know. I am especially IMPRESSED if I see someone who went to a low-tier college working in a really-hard-to-get job. It makes me think that person had to work especially hard to get that job. I see the college tier system as a frivolous “tax” that may have little to do with someone’s abilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:make you think the person is extremely privileged? Especially if they’re white and/or male? I was surprised to hear that viewpoint from someone I know. I am especially IMPRESSED if I see someone who went to a low-tier college working in a really-hard-to-get job. It makes me think that person had to work especially hard to get that job. I see the college tier system as a frivolous “tax” that may have little to do with someone’s abilities.
I assume the organization is a meritocracy and that raw talent has been recognized and rewarded?
Or that the person is connected enough that they got the job regardless or merit
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:make you think the person is extremely privileged? Especially if they’re white and/or male? I was surprised to hear that viewpoint from someone I know. I am especially IMPRESSED if I see someone who went to a low-tier college working in a really-hard-to-get job. It makes me think that person had to work especially hard to get that job. I see the college tier system as a frivolous “tax” that may have little to do with someone’s abilities.
I assume the organization is a meritocracy and that raw talent has been recognized and rewarded?
Anonymous wrote:The most successful executive I personally know got an undergrad degree from University of Georgia. She ended up head of North America for one of the largest beverage brands in the world (you absolutely know the company). No MBA from a fancy school, she just spent 20+ years working her way up this company. Left that company to become CEO of another beverage brand and then took that company public. Big windfall.
I think the main advantage she had was that her parents were business leaders and modeled good professional behaviors.
Probably the wealthiest person I know is a guy who employee #25 at Google. He started working for them as a high school student, building out their server farms. He barely graduated high school, but was a self-taught hardware expert who cut his teeth hosting servers for multiplayer online games. No college degree, raised by a single mom. Owns homes in NYC, a penthouse in SF, ski house in Tahoe. Retired in his early 30s.
People get too hung up on the market signaling of a brand name degree which is, essentially, just a lottery ticket these days. Really what matters is taking advantage of the opportunities you are given and putting in an all-star performance. Grit and focus matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:make you think the person is extremely privileged? Especially if they’re white and/or male? I was surprised to hear that viewpoint from someone I know. I am especially IMPRESSED if I see someone who went to a low-tier college working in a really-hard-to-get job. It makes me think that person had to work especially hard to get that job. I see the college tier system as a frivolous “tax” that may have little to do with someone’s abilities.
I assume the organization is a meritocracy and that raw talent has been recognized and rewarded?
This is what I would assume. As a hiring manager, I can tell you that where someone went to college means literally nothing. Over time you see no correlation whatsoever on where someone went to their abilities. I would also add that the Ivy leaguers we have right now all have not the greatest personalities and only half are really sharp. Also, there is such a growing anti-elitism that someone from an elite background needs to make sure they are very careful how they come off in interviews and OTJ — they can’t rest on the laurels of their college and, if moderate competence is accompanied by even a whiff of condescending elitism, they are toast.
Anonymous wrote:No but I have wondered the opposite. One of our secretaries went to UPenn. She's not incredibly smart either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assume that person is a hard worker whose parents weren't rich and privileged. You have to work a lot harder to prove yourself if you don't have an elite college on your resume.
Or I assume they may have struggled in HS for some reason or that they were rich and privileged and didn't do well or care much in HS. I'm 35 and an Ivy grad and where someone went to college rarely registers one way or another for me. Why would I judge someone on how well they did in school and on a standardized test between the ages of 14-18? At this point, so many owe their college success to sports, legacy status, tutors, writing experts, etc. Why should they get credit for their parents' ability to throw money at getting them into college?
Just take people for who they are and what they can bring to the table. Open your mind!
Anonymous wrote:I assume that person is a hard worker whose parents weren't rich and privileged. You have to work a lot harder to prove yourself if you don't have an elite college on your resume.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:make you think the person is extremely privileged? Especially if they’re white and/or male? I was surprised to hear that viewpoint from someone I know. I am especially IMPRESSED if I see someone who went to a low-tier college working in a really-hard-to-get job. It makes me think that person had to work especially hard to get that job. I see the college tier system as a frivolous “tax” that may have little to do with someone’s abilities.
I assume the organization is a meritocracy and that raw talent has been recognized and rewarded?