Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Home value: $650K
Equity in home: $500K
Total net worth: $725K
So equity/net worth = 69%. I prioritize having low debt vs. having lots of investments.
I would feel very insecure with so much of my net worth tied up in my house.
Anonymous wrote:Home value: $650K
Equity in home: $500K
Total net worth: $725K
So equity/net worth = 69%. I prioritize having low debt vs. having lots of investments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those of us with smaller and less expensive homes, is there value in including the equity in our net worth? I understand the logic when we're talking about a house that has appreciated and can be sold to net a profit and downsize. In my case, that's not an option unless we move to a LCOL area, which is not planned. So the value of the house doesn't have a lot of meaning in my financial planning because we need a place to live. Thoughts?
House is about 20 percent of NW.
This is the way I think about it. A house is a place to live. Hopefully by retirement it is paid for so it is no longer a liability. The equity within it is really useless unless you sell it or borrow against it (at an interest rate). Many Americans in general and people on this forum are obsessed with housing values, viewing houses as an investment, appreciation, etc.
Anonymous wrote:For those of us with smaller and less expensive homes, is there value in including the equity in our net worth? I understand the logic when we're talking about a house that has appreciated and can be sold to net a profit and downsize. In my case, that's not an option unless we move to a LCOL area, which is not planned. So the value of the house doesn't have a lot of meaning in my financial planning because we need a place to live. Thoughts?
House is about 20 percent of NW.