Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow pretty interesting. I had a hunch Georgetown was probably being underranked by US News. Very few schools dominate in a specific subject the way Gtown does
it's overrated even at 30
I'm sorry your child was rejected from Georgetown. Plenty of other great schools out there though!
Anonymous wrote:UNC is really good, I don’t get why more people on here don’t mention it. This kind of confirms it’s perhaps been overlooked! Easily a top 5 public IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow pretty interesting. I had a hunch Georgetown was probably being underranked by US News. Very few schools dominate in a specific subject the way Gtown does
it's overrated even at 30
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Duke tied with Harvard at #4?
Duke boosta!
It just goes to show how bad many of these faux rankings are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting, thank you, OP. I agree about Georgetown. It does its best to be underestimated by US News, by refusing to be in the common apps and requiring not just some scores, but ALL scores - I like how against the grain they are
+1 Georgetown could easily drop its acceptance rate from 12% to below 10% by joining the Common App and going test optional like most of the other top schools.
Won't happen, so don't wait for it.
Anonymous wrote:Duke tied with Harvard at #4?
Duke boosta!
Anonymous wrote:Wow pretty interesting. I had a hunch Georgetown was probably being underranked by US News. Very few schools dominate in a specific subject the way Gtown does
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, here we have some random ranking by some random person (no link provided, naturally), and the usual DCUM rank-obsessed twits are taking it as gospel. Never change!
Why would anyone need a link? The numbers are literally there. The schools with the highest average rank compared to the other schools ended up higher - that’s how comparative rankings work. Should you really be calling people twits if you can’t read data in a table?
Oh, I don't know. I generally like to know whose work I'm looking at, what source it's from, etc. But you do you.