Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My mom “jokes” that I’m the matriarch. Even over my younger siblings. I don’t find it particularly funny that she’s managed to outsource all this emotional labor to me.
Similar situation here. My parents do nothing to facilitate relationships anymore. My siblings and I all live within 30 miles of each other and get together once a quarter, maybe. We all have very young children and we all work and getting everyone together at someone's house on the weekend is a lot of work for the host. Wish my parents stepped in and helped, but they have a weird relationship where my dad controls all of the money and my mom is passive and doesn't pushback, and my dad just doesn't care.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else have very different expectations of what your family life would look like once you were grown and had your own kids?
I grew up with a very close knit family. It wasn’t huge - my parents each had one sibling and we had 2 cousins on each side, but we all spent a ton of time together (I have two siblings as well). There were weekly dinners, regular vacations, parties and get togethers. Us kids were all close in age and always had the best time together. Both of my grandmothers were matriarchs who really brought the family together.
Fast forward to today and we really have none of that. My siblings and I all live in different states, our parents don’t visit a ton and certainly don’t make much effort to bring the family together even for holidays. I married an only child whose parents are only children, and while we live closer to my in-laws there are no cousins or extended family at all really.
I am sad my children won’t have the loud, fun family filled childhood I had.
Anonymous wrote:Can totally relate. I try not to focus on it or dwell on it because I can't change it. Personally I think this is why Latinos in the US have some better health outcomes and indicators than whites in certain areas - because they have strong and big extended families.
Anonymous wrote:My mom “jokes” that I’m the matriarch. Even over my younger siblings. I don’t find it particularly funny that she’s managed to outsource all this emotional labor to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's obvious the previous generation made the effort to stay in the same regional area.
Today most people don't bat an eye about moving across the country for a job. Lots of college students expect to move to the locale of their first job. I only know of a few people who dated with the intent to settle with someone from their home region. Most people date without that criteria, then marry and have kids and it becomes an effort if not an issue to move near one of their families - if this is even remotely possible.
It's not that previous generations made an effort to stay in a region. It was just harder before the rise of the internet to find jobs outside of your city or region. Let's say you graduated from the University of Michigan in 1970. Your potential jobs would come from things like job fairs on campus, and alumni network connections, which means your potential first job would be in places like Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago. You wouldn't even know how to apply to a job in a place like Los Angeles or Seattle.
Now, you can apply for a job anywhere in the country, or the world, even.
Idk, maybe my parents (who graduated college/professional school in the late 60s) were outliers? Each of them went to colleges several states away from their hometowns (where at least 2 generations of family had lived), and then on to grad schools several states away from both, and ultimately settled (after an overseas tour in the military due to Vietnam) in yet another different part of the country entirely. It's not just a new thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's obvious the previous generation made the effort to stay in the same regional area.
Today most people don't bat an eye about moving across the country for a job. Lots of college students expect to move to the locale of their first job. I only know of a few people who dated with the intent to settle with someone from their home region. Most people date without that criteria, then marry and have kids and it becomes an effort if not an issue to move near one of their families - if this is even remotely possible.
It's not that previous generations made an effort to stay in a region. It was just harder before the rise of the internet to find jobs outside of your city or region. Let's say you graduated from the University of Michigan in 1970. Your potential jobs would come from things like job fairs on campus, and alumni network connections, which means your potential first job would be in places like Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago. You wouldn't even know how to apply to a job in a place like Los Angeles or Seattle.
Now, you can apply for a job anywhere in the country, or the world, even.
Anonymous wrote:I am the opposite.
My immediate family are all criminals and not safe to have around my family.
i thought my DH family would be a place my family could find the whole cousins/family thing. Nope MIL hated me wrong side of the tracks.
So my kids have family friends as family.
Makes me sad some days. More from my side. If they weren
t criminals then life would have been different.