Anonymous wrote: I've seen too many lopsided games where 1-2 MLSNext players dominate the game and it's unfair to the rest of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Play whatever sport you want and don't advertise it. If your kid is able to function and show up for both, nobody is going to have a problem with it except for Karens trying to create conflict. Nobody owns these kids. Until someone gives my son something in return (scholarship or salary), nobody controls what he does in his time outside of club-related activities. If you're on scholarship of getting your club fees covered, different story.
Anonymous wrote:I have a kid in MLS Next and one who plays regular travel. I understand the reasoning for the rule and think it's a good one. The risk of injury when playing for both teams increases exponentially so this benefits the players. It also benefits other high school students because it gives them an opportunity to play for their school and it keeps the level of competition more honest. I've seen too many lopsided games where 1-2 MLSNext players dominate the game and it's unfair to the rest of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Play whatever sport you want and don't advertise it. If your kid is able to function and show up for both, nobody is going to have a problem with it except for Karens trying to create conflict. Nobody owns these kids. Until someone gives my son something in return (scholarship or salary), nobody controls what he does in his time outside of club-related activities. If you're on scholarship of getting your club fees covered, different story.
Anonymous wrote:I have a kid in MLS Next and one who plays regular travel. I understand the reasoning for the rule and think it's a good one. The risk of injury when playing for both teams increases exponentially so this benefits the players. It also benefits other high school students because it gives them an opportunity to play for their school and it keeps the level of competition more honest. I've seen too many lopsided games where 1-2 MLSNext players dominate the game and it's unfair to the rest of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has there been any talk of removing the high school sport ban for mls next players?
To benefit who?
Anonymous wrote:Has there been any talk of removing the high school sport ban for mls next players?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Philly Union is not Bethesda, SYC, Achilles or Alexandria. It’s not even MLS Next Let’s use some realistic examples that a competitive soccer player in Virginia might consider.
When there are clubs that are equal caliber to each other (ie- MLS- SYC or Alexandria or Achilles vs VDA or Arlington or Richmond) then yeah some kids might actually prefer to play where they are able to have the high school soccer experience in addition to a competitive one).
Considering the short HS season, poor quality of training/games plus high incidents of injuries, is it safe to say that anyone who prioritizes HS soccer over MLS Next isn't really serious about soccer?
But more into the social aspect.
Anonymous wrote:Philly Union is not Bethesda, SYC, Achilles or Alexandria. It’s not even MLS Next Let’s use some realistic examples that a competitive soccer player in Virginia might consider.
When there are clubs that are equal caliber to each other (ie- MLS- SYC or Alexandria or Achilles vs VDA or Arlington or Richmond) then yeah some kids might actually prefer to play where they are able to have the high school soccer experience in addition to a competitive one).
Anonymous wrote:My son’s MLSNext team often had college coaches come out to their practices to scout. Not something that ever happened with my other kid at high school practices or games. College coaches told him they do not care about high school.