Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
It also needs more diversity in general. Bancroft is 4.0 % African American. That is shocking for a Ward 1 school. I believe the only school with a lower percentage in the city is Oyster and just barely at 3.5%. For perspective, Eaton is 19.4%, Murch is 13.1% and Mann is 7.9%.
Wow. Those are eye opening numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
It also needs more diversity in general. Bancroft is 4.0 % African American. That is shocking for a Ward 1 school. I believe the only school with a lower percentage in the city is Oyster and just barely at 3.5%. For perspective, Eaton is 19.4%, Murch is 13.1% and Mann is 7.9%.
Wow. Those are eye opening numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
It also needs more diversity in general. Bancroft is 4.0 % African American. That is shocking for a Ward 1 school. I believe the only school with a lower percentage in the city is Oyster and just barely at 3.5%. For perspective, Eaton is 19.4%, Murch is 13.1% and Mann is 7.9%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
They could also give up their feeder to overcrowded Deal.
I was at a Bancroft open house and an admin warned me that this is a very real possibility with the upcoming boundary review. It’s no longer economically diverse “enough”, it’s physically surrounded by non-feeder school boundaries, and there’s legitimate programmatic reasons to feed a bilingual elementary into the DCPS bilingual middle school (MacFarland). Like Powell before it, there would be a long grandfathering period, but I’d be very hesitant to buy in-bounds with a baby/toddler at this point.
Anonymous wrote:My 2 kids who go to a non-title 1 school pay for school lunch. My child who goes to a title 1 school does not (everyone gets free lunch).
Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
They could also give up their feeder to overcrowded Deal.
I was at a Bancroft open house and an admin warned me that this is a very real possibility with the upcoming boundary review. It’s no longer economically diverse “enough”, it’s physically surrounded by non-feeder school boundaries, and there’s legitimate programmatic reasons to feed a bilingual elementary into the DCPS bilingual middle school (MacFarland). Like Powell before it, there would be a long grandfathering period, but I’d be very hesitant to buy in-bounds with a baby/toddler at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
They could also give up their feeder to overcrowded Deal.
I was at a Bancroft open house and an admin warned me that this is a very real possibility with the upcoming boundary review. It’s no longer economically diverse “enough”, it’s physically surrounded by non-feeder school boundaries, and there’s legitimate programmatic reasons to feed a bilingual elementary into the DCPS bilingual middle school (MacFarland). Like Powell before it, there would be a long grandfathering period, but I’d be very hesitant to buy in-bounds with a baby/toddler at this point.
When is the boundary review expected to be finished?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
They could also give up their feeder to overcrowded Deal.
I was at a Bancroft open house and an admin warned me that this is a very real possibility with the upcoming boundary review. It’s no longer economically diverse “enough”, it’s physically surrounded by non-feeder school boundaries, and there’s legitimate programmatic reasons to feed a bilingual elementary into the DCPS bilingual middle school (MacFarland). Like Powell before it, there would be a long grandfathering period, but I’d be very hesitant to buy in-bounds with a baby/toddler at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
They could also give up their feeder to overcrowded Deal.
Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.
Anonymous wrote:Bancroft could probably easily regain their Title I status if they improve their recruitment efforts. There are tons of income eligible families in Columbia Heights and Brightwood who could enroll at the school. Bancroft should definitely think about implementing a language fluency test and request equitable access seats.