Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it was 140 at my Louisiana school b/c there was no money for differentiation. I didn't make the cut but given both my kids have IQs in the low 130s, I suspect mine is there as well.
Are you saying you had to have an IQ test score over 140? In Louisiana? There’s no way you could fill a classroom if that were the criteria anywhere. By definition gifted would be over 140 but that’s only about 0.004% of the population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in NY, not here, in the 80's, and we didn't have any gifted test or anything called gifted education. I think they still don't. Gifted programs here are absurd and almost none of the kids are remotely gifted.
False. All publics did testing at many levels.
How would you know that? In NYC the gifted programs have been off and on over the decades. I don’t know about upstate.
Anonymous wrote:it was 140 at my Louisiana school b/c there was no money for differentiation. I didn't make the cut but given both my kids have IQs in the low 130s, I suspect mine is there as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in NY, not here, in the 80's, and we didn't have any gifted test or anything called gifted education. I think they still don't. Gifted programs here are absurd and almost none of the kids are remotely gifted.
False. All publics did testing at many levels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in NY, not here, in the 80's, and we didn't have any gifted test or anything called gifted education. I think they still don't. Gifted programs here are absurd and almost none of the kids are remotely gifted.
My kids are in the "gifted" program and in my opinion are not gifted just very smart. But that is what the current "gifted" programs are designed for. When they are pulling 15-20% of kids, they know that they are not all gifted. And frankly, if gen ed wasn't so watered down, parents wouldn't be so motivated to get their kids into "gifted" education. I certainly don't care if you call it gifted. You could just call it advanced or accelerated or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:As a kid I remember taking the Iowa Assessment in the mid-late 80s, which is not an IQ test, but more like the academic standards assessments my kids do in APS.
In college in the late 90s I took a psych seminar about IQ testing and we used Ravens Advances Matrices.
Anonymous wrote:I was in MCPS in mid-80s and took it and did get into the gifted program. It was the WISC-R. I also used it to join Mensa.
Anonymous wrote:How does this test, which I took in 1893-1984, relate to the test used by MENSA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in NY, not here, in the 80's, and we didn't have any gifted test or anything called gifted education. I think they still don't. Gifted programs here are absurd and almost none of the kids are remotely gifted.
My kids are in the "gifted" program and in my opinion are not gifted just very smart. But that is what the current "gifted" programs are designed for. When they are pulling 15-20% of kids, they know that they are not all gifted. And frankly, if gen ed wasn't so watered down, parents wouldn't be so motivated to get their kids into "gifted" education. I certainly don't care if you call it gifted. You could just call it advanced or accelerated or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in MCPS in mid-80s and took it and did get into the gifted program. It was the WISC-R. I also used it to join Mensa.
OP - how did you find the record of it? Mensa used your childhood test to get in even recently?
Also… how do you like the Mensa activities and people?
