Anonymous wrote:It isn't justice reform causing the problem. It is desperate people who have access to guns and intimidate others with cars that is the problem. It really doesn't matter what kind of penalties exist for these crimes, unless you are actually able to catch the criminals, which seldom happens, then they get away with it and do it again.
Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when people have no hope. The middle class has been greatly squeezesd, and the lower class has no hope to move up. So, drugs and violence continue to grow.
When the middle class is strong, and the lower class knows they can get a great education and move up in status, hope is present, and drugs and violence decrease.
We need a wealth tax, we need giant corporations with record profits and share buybacks to pay their fair share in taxes (in some cases, they haven't paid ANY taxes), and we need to support those who need help, so they can move up, and out of the lower class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A friend recently filed a police report for an attempted car theft. The officer viewed the Ring footage and confirmed that the group had triggered many police reports the night before. The officer told my friend that the group was eventually pursued by MoCo police but that the police had to stop at the DC line. DC doesn't let MoCo police pursue suspects in DC. Does anyone know if this is a real rule?
Just asked an officer. Can only cross a border for a violent felony.
Anonymous wrote:Back when I used to live in Chevy Chase (I am rational so I moved to nova years ago), Takoma Park was known as basically just a haven for stinky hippies who couldn't afford bethesda/chevy chase. These days people talk as if it's some kind of place that that anyone other than a hobo would want to spend time in. How did MoCo fall so low to let one of the crappiest parts of the county have any power??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thread to find out which county councilmembers were committing carjackings, but no, it's just the same old DCUM DCUM-ing.
Meaning what, exactly?
There’s a strong desire for more policing and harsher penalties, seen most recently at the council’s community meeting about traffic safety. The number of residents calling for fewer police seems quite small, actually. Perhaps the council should listen?
At that meeting, they proposed police not enforce traffic laws at all. Instead, some other group would be set up just for that purpose.
The reasoning I guess is people who commit traffic offenses end up getting arrested for other infractions during the traffic stop.
Watch as this do gooder initiative morphs into a privately run company who will enforce traffic laws. Tickets and enforcements will explode and tons of residents will get slammed with all sorts of fines for any kind of perceived minor infraction, because a private company will be for profit..
But hey, at least the police aren't involved, amirite?
As usual, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These “desperate people” aren’t stealing cars because they can’t afford reliable transportation. WTAF with that
Also I think there was another one in TP today.
Seriously.
People are delusional.
If your car is stolen what happens to it? It gets sold or stripped down for parts.
It is not used so "desperate" people can get to their jobs.
Anonymous wrote:At what point does the working person...the person working one, two or three jobs to pay their bills get protected from crime and car jackings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thread to find out which county councilmembers were committing carjackings, but no, it's just the same old DCUM DCUM-ing.
Meaning what, exactly?
There’s a strong desire for more policing and harsher penalties, seen most recently at the council’s community meeting about traffic safety. The number of residents calling for fewer police seems quite small, actually. Perhaps the council should listen?
At that meeting, they proposed police not enforce traffic laws at all. Instead, some other group would be set up just for that purpose.
The reasoning I guess is people who commit traffic offenses end up getting arrested for other infractions during the traffic stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thread to find out which county councilmembers were committing carjackings, but no, it's just the same old DCUM DCUM-ing.
Meaning what, exactly?
There’s a strong desire for more policing and harsher penalties, seen most recently at the council’s community meeting about traffic safety. The number of residents calling for fewer police seems quite small, actually. Perhaps the council should listen?
At that meeting, they proposed police not enforce traffic laws at all. Instead, some other group would be set up just for that purpose.
The reasoning I guess is people who commit traffic offenses end up getting arrested for other infractions during the traffic stop.
The whole point is to decrease the possibility that people with existing warrants, ie already committed a crime, have interactions with police so that they can be caught and held accountable for their criminal conduct.
Anonymous wrote:And yet people keep electing the SJW council members.
This was the logical consequence.
Anonymous wrote:A friend recently filed a police report for an attempted car theft. The officer viewed the Ring footage and confirmed that the group had triggered many police reports the night before. The officer told my friend that the group was eventually pursued by MoCo police but that the police had to stop at the DC line. DC doesn't let MoCo police pursue suspects in DC. Does anyone know if this is a real rule?
Anonymous wrote:A friend recently filed a police report for an attempted car theft. The officer viewed the Ring footage and confirmed that the group had triggered many police reports the night before. The officer told my friend that the group was eventually pursued by MoCo police but that the police had to stop at the DC line. DC doesn't let MoCo police pursue suspects in DC. Does anyone know if this is a real rule?