Anonymous wrote:Does it matter? Nothing you or your child can change. Obsessing with how tall they will be is as weird as obsessing with how big their penis will be.
Anonymous wrote:What would cause a kid to not grow as tall as their parents? Obviously other relatives’ genetics come into play. My daughter was 5’.75” at her 14th birthday (so I suspect she’s done growing as she got her period when she was 12.5). Her birth mom is 5’3” and her birth dad is 5’5”. Is it the dad’s height, which is short for a man but not overly short for their race and age.
Anonymous wrote:Add the mother's height to the father's height in either inches or centimeters.
Add 5 inches (13 centimeters) for boys or subtract 5 inches (13 centimeters) for girls.
Divide by 2.
Mayo clinic
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/childrens-health/expert-answers/child-growth/faq-20057990
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's a fine population-wide estimate, but may not be accurate for all kids. Mine was at the 75th percentile until she shot up between age 2.5-3, and has been at the 95th percentile since. She hasn't hit puberty yet, so time will tell, but likely she'll be closer to the 95th percentile range as an adult (5'8"-5'10").
These were my stats as a kid. I stayed 95% until puberty and then topped out at 5' 5". Mom is 5' 10", dad is 5' 8". My sister is 5' 2". You never know.
Yep, my daughter was always 95th percentile but stopped growing at 5'6.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter was 35.75 at 2 years, which would mean 5’11.5”. She’s 5’9” at 12.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's a fine population-wide estimate, but may not be accurate for all kids. Mine was at the 75th percentile until she shot up between age 2.5-3, and has been at the 95th percentile since. She hasn't hit puberty yet, so time will tell, but likely she'll be closer to the 95th percentile range as an adult (5'8"-5'10").
These were my stats as a kid. I stayed 95% until puberty and then topped out at 5' 5". Mom is 5' 10", dad is 5' 8". My sister is 5' 2". You never know.
Anonymous wrote:My DH is 6’5”. His mom is 5’8”, his dad is 5’11” and everyone else in both families is SHORTER than that. His sister is 5’5”.
He literally came out of nowhere in the genetic lottery.
Height can be strange!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone so fixated with height? Admittedly, I am only 5’4” and I often wished I had a couple of inches more, but taller is not always better. Personally, think it’s better to be 5’4” than 6’ as a woman. I am sure some people disagree, but it’s not like taller is always better.
A PP above said her husband at 6’5” hit the genetic lottery. I hope he feels that way, but I personally prefer my son to be 6’2 max… there is a happy medium too.
I don’t understand this obsession with height. Being proportioned, muscular, fit, is important too (if not more)
I'm only 5'8" and wish I was at least two inches taller. In my family, I just feel so short.
My DH is 6'5", our older children are both at least 5'6" and are nowhere close to being finished growing, and the rest of my family towers over me, as well. One of my sisters is 5'11", and the other is 6'0", and they carry themselves so beautifully at their heights, always looking so regal. My brothers are all at least 6'2", so I am definitely the short one in my family.
That’s great that you like being tall (and wish you were taller). My whole point is that many people don’t think that as a woman being 6’ is better than being 6’4”. Or that as a man is better to be 6’5” than 6’1”.
My DH is tall 6’2” (not by your standard maybe) and his whole family is very tall. His sisters are 5’10 and 6’ and his dad was/is 6’3”. The sisters might look elegant with a certain type of clothes, but I would not trade my 5’4” for 6’… for many reasons.
While I hope my son takes after his dad, I hope my girls will be more like me than DH’s sisters (and so does my DH)
Anonymous wrote:So the formula is actually double height at age 2 for boys and age 18 months for girls.
My first is 7 and has been consistently chugging along the 90% percentile line since an infant. Should put him around 6'1" if it continues, which was also double his age 2 height.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's a fine population-wide estimate, but may not be accurate for all kids. Mine was at the 75th percentile until she shot up between age 2.5-3, and has been at the 95th percentile since. She hasn't hit puberty yet, so time will tell, but likely she'll be closer to the 95th percentile range as an adult (5'8"-5'10").