Anonymous wrote:Another voice saying: random. We live in the zone for the school. Waitlist #30. Fortunately it was for K in 2020-2021–so they made it to us on that list.
Every time I think about it, I am reminded how absurd it is that such an incredible educational opportunity is distributed via a lotto instead of being universally available.
Anonymous wrote:Will immersion classes increase size too? They are already pretty big to begin with.
Anonymous wrote:Curious whether anyone can share recent experience getting siblings admitted to the English program at SCES if the older child is in French? Wondering for the future since DC got into French. I know there are no guarantees and it can be school for school, case by case. Wondering what people can share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it’s a pure lottery
This isn't true. Read the fine print. Mcps writes a very vague but clear message that it is NOT a pure lottery.
They consider zip, FARMS, parent at home speak/heritage, gender, siblings of course and other things that aren't revealed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: The purpose of these immersion schools is to teach the immersion language to students who DON’T already know it. There is absolutely no preference for kids who already speak it.
This statement is discriminatory. It implies that the programs exclude native speakers (which is not true). In fact native speakers benefit the most because it helps them maintain their heritage language and strengthen connections to their community of origin, which is NOT as easy as many people seem to think.
My kid is a native speaker in immersion there (it's my native language) and I'm just thrilled with his progress and mastery of French. I've always spoken French to him, but now he reads, he writes...his grammar is great...it's like he's going to the neighborhood school in France, but here. His teacher says that his fluency benefits his classmates too, because he brings others up with him.
Finally, the purpose of immersion is to benefit anyone who is interested. I feel so lucky that he has this opportunity. It would be a lot harder to get my child to this level of fluency without it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it’s a pure lottery
This isn't true. Read the fine print. Mcps writes a very vague but clear message that it is NOT a pure lottery.
They consider zip, FARMS, parent at home speak/heritage, gender, siblings of course and other things that aren't revealed.
They certainly admit to considering zip (some schools, anyway), socioeconomic status, and siblings, but what makes you think they consider household language or gender?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: The purpose of these immersion schools is to teach the immersion language to students who DON’T already know it. There is absolutely no preference for kids who already speak it.
This statement is discriminatory. It implies that the programs exclude native speakers (which is not true). In fact native speakers benefit the most because it helps them maintain their heritage language and strengthen connections to their community of origin, which is NOT as easy as many people seem to think.
Anonymous wrote: The purpose of these immersion schools is to teach the immersion language to students who DON’T already know it. There is absolutely no preference for kids who already speak it.
Anonymous wrote:The purpose of these immersion schools is to teach the immersion language to students who DON’T already know it. There is absolutely no preference for kids who already speak it.