Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment. Is there a problem with a white guy wanting compensation for such?

Nobody has said there is. Right now these are only allegations, though. It’s not an open-and-shut case until they are substantiated.

It seems a little odd to me that he filed the complaint without getting a notice of right to sue from EEOC first, because he could be waiting 6 months for that before he’s in a position to amend the complaint. That seems to create a pretty good argument to stay the suit until he’s gotten the notice (or decides not to pursue a Title VII. Makes me wonder if he’s hoping to get a quick settlement before then.

Per the filing, he has received annual equity awards of “at least $250,000” every year since 2016. If they supposedly fired him for cause, they may have clawed back the unvested portion of the awards.

Regardless, he alleges that he was instructed to fire a subordinate for being a white male in order to make room for a woman on the team. That is an illegal command to give an employee and would have created a personal legal liability for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment. Is there a problem with a white guy wanting compensation for such?

Nobody has said there is. Right now these are only allegations, though. It’s not an open-and-shut case until they are substantiated.

It seems a little odd to me that he filed the complaint without getting a notice of right to sue from EEOC first, because he could be waiting 6 months for that before he’s in a position to amend the complaint. That seems to create a pretty good argument to stay the suit until he’s gotten the notice (or decides not to pursue a Title VII. Makes me wonder if he’s hoping to get a quick settlement before then.

Per the filing, he has received annual equity awards of “at least $250,000” every year since 2016. If they supposedly fired him for cause, they may have clawed back the unvested portion of the awards.

Regardless, he alleges that he was instructed to fire a subordinate for being a white male in order to make room for a woman on the team. That is an illegal command to give an employee and would have created a personal legal liability for him.

This happens so often to support diversity goals. Good for him for publicizing this.

Anonymous wrote:The Lipstick Alley commentary on this is incredible 😂

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/google-exec-ryan-olohan-fired-after-female-boss-tiffany-miller-groped-him-at-drunken-bash.5156167/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard work, and being a tall good looking guy from random college, you can go far.

https://business.providence.edu/alumni-spotlight-seven-future-olohan-friars-make-music/

Not a random college in that sector.

Big Tech hires often from Providence college? It has a 60% acceptance rate, so I guess I'll sign up my kids!

What does that have to do with this lawsuit?

He has no technical skills Google needs, he has bounced from dying project to dying project — he was a lucky early hire who probably coasted on his “executive presence”, height and good looks to rest and vest, and now that the gravy train has ended he is scrambling.

Just look at his LinkedIn. It’s all there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment. Is there a problem with a white guy wanting compensation for such?

Nobody has said there is. Right now these are only allegations, though. It’s not an open-and-shut case until they are substantiated.

It seems a little odd to me that he filed the complaint without getting a notice of right to sue from EEOC first, because he could be waiting 6 months for that before he’s in a position to amend the complaint. That seems to create a pretty good argument to stay the suit until he’s gotten the notice (or decides not to pursue a Title VII. Makes me wonder if he’s hoping to get a quick settlement before then.

Per the filing, he has received annual equity awards of “at least $250,000” every year since 2016. If they supposedly fired him for cause, they may have clawed back the unvested portion of the awards.

Regardless, he alleges that he was instructed to fire a subordinate for being a white male in order to make room for a woman on the team. That is an illegal command to give an employee and would have created a personal legal liability for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment. Is there a problem with a white guy wanting compensation for such?

Nobody has said there is. Right now these are only allegations, though. It’s not an open-and-shut case until they are substantiated.

It seems a little odd to me that he filed the complaint without getting a notice of right to sue from EEOC first, because he could be waiting 6 months for that before he’s in a position to amend the complaint. That seems to create a pretty good argument to stay the suit until he’s gotten the notice (or decides not to pursue a Title VII. Makes me wonder if he’s hoping to get a quick settlement before then.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard work, and being a tall good looking guy from random college, you can go far.

https://business.providence.edu/alumni-spotlight-seven-future-olohan-friars-make-music/

Not a random college in that sector.

Big Tech hires often from Providence college? It has a 60% acceptance rate, so I guess I'll sign up my kids!

What does that have to do with this lawsuit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard work, and being a tall good looking guy from random college, you can go far.

https://business.providence.edu/alumni-spotlight-seven-future-olohan-friars-make-music/

Not a random college in that sector.

Big Tech hires often from Providence college? It has a 60% acceptance rate, so I guess I'll sign up my kids!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a jerk.

His supervisor is a jerk and a creep and gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a jerk.

His supervisor is a jerk and a creep and gross.

Anonymous wrote:He is a jerk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a jerk.

If he was sexually harassed and fired how is he the jerk?

So a straight guy gets a Pat on his butt from a women and he wants her fired, her career ruined it is a little nuts.

And the guy is a double jerk letting this get out to press

I mean when I was 25 years younger and better looking on a business trip a co worker on last night just me and
had dinner. She wanted to come back to my room and screw me, she hugged my and grabbed my hand.

At time I had a 1 year old and a 3 year old and she was about to get engaged. At what point would I pull a dick head move and go to HR, risk getting fired, explain to wife this story, try to get women fired and break up her relationship.