Cheap flip flops would be worse IMHO. No support.Anonymous wrote:So we did this, and it was great, but the details are different enough that in your case, I probably wouldn’t.
Our walk was five minutes (just confirmed on google maps) and it was March, so not hot. The difference between 5 and 10 mins is a LOT. You’ve got to remember that city people like us walk five or 10 mins and it’s nothing. Suburb people? Older people? Even we got comments about it being a bit long. I would not do 10 mins, and certainly not in a DC summer.
Some things we did that I would recommend if you opted to move forward: We provided complementary flip flops for people to grab on their way out of the service in a variety of sizes if they had uncomfortable shoes. My DH and I led the whole wedding (150 people) in a festive little (very slow moving) parade, so there was no risk of getting lost. It was down 16th street two blocks and lots of cars honked and waved, it was really cool. We also had polled our older guests to see who might not be able to walk. Only my grandmother opted for a Lyft and we had a point person all set to get her into a Lyft and to the reception. Literally everyone else walked. We had a backup plan of buying a couple hundred cheap umbrellas from Amazon if the 5 day forecast predicted rain (it didn’t).
Anonymous wrote:I am in the midst of planning a summer wedding. Our ceremony and reception are at different venues but the two are a ten minute walk from each other (five minute drive) and both in downtown DC. My usual instinct is that when a wedding has two venues, it's incumbent upon the hosts to provide transportation but I'm not sure if that's true here.
Would it be unreasonable to ask guests to walk from one venue to the next? Or otherwise make their own way?
I have not made my mind up either way so would love advice on balance cost (of transportation) and etiquette.
Anonymous wrote:You will also have to provide directions to the reception. Out of towners aren’t going to know how to get there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Provide transportation - a shuttle that makes a few loops. If people want to walk instead they can do so, but at least the option is there for those who can’t.
+1 perfect solution
Anonymous wrote:This is why I like the ceremony and reception to be held in the same place. It avoids all this whining!
Anonymous wrote:Will guests have left their cars at the location of the ceremony? It's probably unreasonable to have people walk back to cars at night, especially because some will be drunk.
Ride share is fine for younger guests who don't want to walk.
I don't think the OP sounds like she is going to be demanding people walk. Even if she doesen't provide transportation, people are still free to use it. I certainly would; I'm not walking 10 minutes in the summer heat while wearing wedding attire.Anonymous wrote:I have health issues and would not be happy with you demanding we walk. I would drive to both places.