Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs were 20 and 22 when DH was born.
That’s young!
50 years ago it was not.
My mom had me at 27 and she was considered AMA in the late 1970s
Yeah, where? My mother had me at 29 also in that timeframe and was definitely not AMA.
Anonymous wrote:
<25yo. I had my first at 29/30 in NYC and felt like an outlier as a young mom there. Jokes on me because now I’m having another at 42yo. So l guess I get to experience the modern umc versions of both.
Good luck to you! My girls are 8.5 years apart-one in my late 20s and one at 37. I stopped then because I didn’t want to have a child in 3 different decades ;p
Anonymous wrote:Still studying, not making a livable wage, not launched, not married.
Anonymous wrote:Under 22 if on the college track. Under 18 if on the non-college track.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs were 20 and 22 when DH was born.
That’s young!
50 years ago it was not.
My mom had me at 27 and she was considered AMA in the late 1970s
Yeah, where? My mother had me at 29 also in that timeframe and was definitely not AMA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs were 20 and 22 when DH was born.
That’s young!
50 years ago it was not.
My mom had me at 27 and she was considered AMA in the late 1970s
Anonymous wrote:<25yo. I had my first at 29/30 in NYC and felt like an outlier as a young mom there. Jokes on me because now I’m having another at 42yo. So l guess I get to experience the modern umc versions of both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs were 20 and 22 when DH was born.
That’s young!
50 years ago it was not.