Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Men don’t value what they don’t pay for. I’m not talking about sex. If a man won’t share his money with you he doesn’t love you.
I love my partner very much but I am not commingling my kids' future assets with his finances and assets.
So you have love but no trust or confidence in your partnership, and you are dedicating your time to someone who won’t provide anything for you and vice versa. Sounds brutal.
Anonymous wrote:No kids from first. Everything joint.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Men don’t value what they don’t pay for. I’m not talking about sex. If a man won’t share his money with you he doesn’t love you.
I love my partner very much but I am not commingling my kids' future assets with his finances and assets.
So you have love but no trust or confidence in your partnership, and you are dedicating your time to someone who won’t provide anything for you and vice versa. Sounds brutal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything joint. I have 3 kids from first marriage. DH has none. I have life insurance with my kids as beneficiaries that will go into a trust with my parents managing the trust. Once my kids are out of college, I’ll reevaluate the life insurance.
For DH and me, all our income, savings, investments, and real estate are in both our names. When either of us dies, it all goes to the other.
I don’t find this to be complicated at all and it seems weird to not partner because of finances. DH and I both make relatively similar salaries and come to the relationship with similar assets.
This all works out great unless you pre-decease him.
No. If I predecease him, the life insurance goes into a trust managed by my parents. The kids would go full time to their bio father. DH would get the rest of my resource. If I was married to bio dad, all my resources would go to bio dad.
Who manages the trust when your parents die?
My parents are healthy. Oldest kid is almost 18. He would be the manger of the trust if my parents are unable. I already have separate college funds for each kid. Not sure why they would need more than what I planned.
I wound rethink that. You can hire a lawyer/trust company to manage it.
I don’t turn much over until the kids are 32, 18 years s way too young.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Men don’t value what they don’t pay for. I’m not talking about sex. If a man won’t share his money with you he doesn’t love you.
I love my partner very much but I am not commingling my kids' future assets with his finances and assets.
So you have love but no trust or confidence in your partnership, and you are dedicating your time to someone who won’t provide anything for you and vice versa. Sounds brutal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Men don’t value what they don’t pay for. I’m not talking about sex. If a man won’t share his money with you he doesn’t love you.
I love my partner very much but I am not commingling my kids' future assets with his finances and assets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything joint. I have 3 kids from first marriage. DH has none. I have life insurance with my kids as beneficiaries that will go into a trust with my parents managing the trust. Once my kids are out of college, I’ll reevaluate the life insurance.
For DH and me, all our income, savings, investments, and real estate are in both our names. When either of us dies, it all goes to the other.
I don’t find this to be complicated at all and it seems weird to not partner because of finances. DH and I both make relatively similar salaries and come to the relationship with similar assets.
This all works out great unless you pre-decease him.
No. If I predecease him, the life insurance goes into a trust managed by my parents. The kids would go full time to their bio father. DH would get the rest of my resource. If I was married to bio dad, all my resources would go to bio dad.
Who manages the trust when your parents die?
My parents are healthy. Oldest kid is almost 18. He would be the manger of the trust if my parents are unable. I already have separate college funds for each kid. Not sure why they would need more than what I planned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Men don’t value what they don’t pay for. I’m not talking about sex. If a man won’t share his money with you he doesn’t love you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
I respect prostitution as a profession if it’s your choice. Stay safe
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything joint. I have 3 kids from first marriage. DH has none. I have life insurance with my kids as beneficiaries that will go into a trust with my parents managing the trust. Once my kids are out of college, I’ll reevaluate the life insurance.
For DH and me, all our income, savings, investments, and real estate are in both our names. When either of us dies, it all goes to the other.
I don’t find this to be complicated at all and it seems weird to not partner because of finances. DH and I both make relatively similar salaries and come to the relationship with similar assets.
This all works out great unless you pre-decease him.
No. If I predecease him, the life insurance goes into a trust managed by my parents. The kids would go full time to their bio father. DH would get the rest of my resource. If I was married to bio dad, all my resources would go to bio dad.
Who manages the trust when your parents die?
My parents are healthy. Oldest kid is almost 18. He would be the manger of the trust if my parents are unable. I already have separate college funds for each kid. Not sure why they would need more than what I planned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
More like: a man is work and I don’t work for free.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
What are you even going on about? The PP is very smart to not blend. If both parties have means and kids there's no reason they can't preserve their own estates for their children.
I'm the same, my assets are in a trust. My (second) husband has his own assets. I have no interest in them. And he has no interest in mine. We are both self sufficient but we also don't nickle and dime things like meals out. We split who pays but no one is keeping score. It works for us.
Well part of my dream for a family is building a joint lifestyle and legacy, which is pretty much impossible in this situation.
Translation: A man is the plan, i need his money and I don't want it to go to his kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't commingle any accounts and never will.
We each own a home we bought before we were married.
Wills haven't changed (all to my kids) but I did put him as the beneficiary to one of my savings.
What a shitty thing to have to settle this much for companionship.
I will regret my first marriage as long as I live, it leads to garbage like this and what is the point.
Sorry you can't support yourself but most of us are adults and can.