Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To me any car is cringe that is not that functional. So like if suv then jeep/ Range Rover/ Land Rover makes sense but Lexus/ Porsche Cayenne is so cheesy. But if ‘sedan’ then Lexus is fine as is bmw etc. if sports car then the obvious choices. What to me is cheesy is having a car that’s for label only and no reason to have that function
What is the function of Jeeps and land rovers that those other SUVs don’t have? Don’t say off roading because that not what the majority of them use it for. The Cayenne is just as capable as the Land Rover only it handles where most people use it which is on the road. Jeeps serve little function in your definition as they aren’t very good on pavement where 99.99% of people drive.
Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with Lexus SUVs? I've never owned or thought much about them, but I see many in my neighborhood and they look like any other SUV to me.
Anonymous wrote:Jeeps are the most cringe car in the world. I regularly fight the urge to slash the tires and top every time I see one in a parking lot. I just want to punch their owners in the face.
Anonymous wrote:You know this will have a huge response bias against luxury cars, right?
Anonymous wrote:Corolla
Camry
Prius
Anonymous wrote:To me any car is cringe that is not that functional. So like if suv then jeep/ Range Rover/ Land Rover makes sense but Lexus/ Porsche Cayenne is so cheesy. But if ‘sedan’ then Lexus is fine as is bmw etc. if sports car then the obvious choices. What to me is cheesy is having a car that’s for label only and no reason to have that function