Anonymous wrote:So I would take off my elite DCUM hat and say, you can have a family of 4 but you'll want to marry very, very young. You'll want to live in a town that isn't as expensive as here. If you pursue higher ed, realize that your partner will take on the vast majority of raising a family. Realize that many young marriages don't last past kid 2.
Then also realize that a family of 4 might mean you actually had and lost 3 of 7 children you conceived. You might have a child with special medical issues that never leaves your home. You might have healthy children that never truly launch. You may have children that are drug addicts. You may have to take custody of one of your grandchildren. You may have all of this and your partner died 10 years prior like my Aunt.
The more kids you have the more real the possibilities that you have a lifelong commitment to thise kids. Unless you take the traditional Irish approach and tell them to F off when they turn 18. Not your problem.
I must do this at times.Anonymous wrote:More power to them and I think it's great. I have an extended family and think those relationships are a real gift. I do believe those of us with 4+ kids raise our kids with a bit of a different value set and order of priorities. Large families develop a certain emotional intelligences in kids that are fading fast in our individual-focused society. It's a view that's tiresome to defend to others who don't share it so I'll just leave it at IYKYK.
Anonymous wrote:Do they care about the future of the planet?
Lots of children will mean a lot of future resources depleted, and then their kids and their kids...multiplier effect is real.
Anonymous wrote:Imho its unfair to children unless there is inherited wealth and parents can have flexible part time jobs to raise kids.