Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard is #18, according to Forbes.
Out of some 4000 colleges and universities in the USA, #18 is elite. There's not much difference between #1 and #18.
Columbia booster spotted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.
Administrators are correct that Harvard doesn't prioritize undergraduates, though.
Oh for sure. But I think the list is presented as a ranking of excellence in undergraduate teaching or something along those lines. I’m not convinced that a bunch of booster-y administrators are going to be a reliable source to tell us where the best undergraduate education can be found. no disrespect meant to Elon, I hear it’s a lovely place, but number one for undergraduate education in the country??
Well, ask professors what they value for their own kids. FIL would not allow his kids to apply to schools like Harvard that absolutely do not care about the undergrads, nor any school where undergrads are taught primarily by TAs (who know nothing about teaching).
Anonymous wrote:Doing some research for my DC who is a sophomore. Recent grad outcomes appear very pedestrian and it appears many are struggling to find work. Are the glory days for Harvard behind them? Serious question. I cannot find reasons why Harvard is any better than other schools in the top 50 USNWR rankings. Recent matriculants I have known personally are not that impressive and seem to be a blend of legacy, VIP and athlete. What am I missing? Perhaps it is a dying brand - what am I missing? Does the emperor have any clothes here?
Harvard's okay if you like old buildings and cold weather but all the savvy DCUM families send their kids to Clemson and Auburn nowadays.
Defeated on the other thread so had to smile here. Sad yet telling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.
Administrators are correct that Harvard doesn't prioritize undergraduates, though.
Oh for sure. But I think the list is presented as a ranking of excellence in undergraduate teaching or something along those lines. I’m not convinced that a bunch of booster-y administrators are going to be a reliable source to tell us where the best undergraduate education can be found. no disrespect meant to Elon, I hear it’s a lovely place, but number one for undergraduate education in the country??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overrated? It's an assemblage of many top scholars. For many grad programs, it is very prestigious. So are some other top universities across the board (yale, chicago, stanford, etc.) and then others are top in some areas. For the undergrad experience, it's hit or miss, but half of a university education is the degree stamp and certification and outside, Harvard is still salivated over more than most other peers. Take that for what it is, a leg up.
Agreed. --another Harvard grad
Anonymous wrote:Doing some research for my DC who is a sophomore. Recent grad outcomes appear very pedestrian and it appears many are struggling to find work. Are the glory days for Harvard behind them? Serious question. I cannot find reasons why Harvard is any better than other schools in the top 50 USNWR rankings. Recent matriculants I have known personally are not that impressive and seem to be a blend of legacy, VIP and athlete. What am I missing? Perhaps it is a dying brand - what am I missing? Does the emperor have any clothes here?
Anonymous wrote:Nothing says "prestige" like the Harvard brand. I will say when I went to undergrad there, a certain set of young male undergraduates used the Harvard name to pick up women - they called it "dropping the H-bomb." It was disgusting then and still seems to exist in the final clubs, which still exist, because of the alumni.
Anonymous wrote:Harvard is #18, according to Forbes.
Out of some 4000 colleges and universities in the USA, #18 is elite. There's not much difference between #1 and #18.
Anonymous wrote:Let us know when your kid gets in and you turn it down as overrated.