Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
If by administrators you mean "gatehouse", then yes. Individual principals aren't pushing for this.
I agree that the administration is behind this. I'm not sure why, though. FCPS is the traditional school district while APS is the progressive school district that moves on all the new fads in education. Why is FCPS moving so quickly on this?
FCPS never met a trend it didn't like. This is an old concept just being recycled. It will generate data that some administrator who doesn't understand teaching can use to justify their job.
Are you disagreeing? Do you think it's not correct that APS is the progressive school district and FCPS is the more traditional school district?
I don't know anything about APS other than they pay better than FCPS. I do know that FCPS is constantly cycling through the latest trends to come out of ed schools and the bureaucracies even if they are recycled trends from years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
If by administrators you mean "gatehouse", then yes. Individual principals aren't pushing for this.
I agree that the administration is behind this. I'm not sure why, though. FCPS is the traditional school district while APS is the progressive school district that moves on all the new fads in education. Why is FCPS moving so quickly on this?
FCPS never met a trend it didn't like. This is an old concept just being recycled. It will generate data that some administrator who doesn't understand teaching can use to justify their job.
Are you disagreeing? Do you think it's not correct that APS is the progressive school district and FCPS is the more traditional school district?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
If by administrators you mean "gatehouse", then yes. Individual principals aren't pushing for this.
I agree that the administration is behind this. I'm not sure why, though. FCPS is the traditional school district while APS is the progressive school district that moves on all the new fads in education. Why is FCPS moving so quickly on this?
FCPS never met a trend it didn't like. This is an old concept just being recycled. It will generate data that some administrator who doesn't understand teaching can use to justify their job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
If by administrators you mean "gatehouse", then yes. Individual principals aren't pushing for this.
I agree that the administration is behind this. I'm not sure why, though. FCPS is the traditional school district while APS is the progressive school district that moves on all the new fads in education. Why is FCPS moving so quickly on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
If by administrators you mean "gatehouse", then yes. Individual principals aren't pushing for this.
Anonymous wrote:Again, this isn’t coming from the board. It’s coming from administrators. And I am not understanding that this is equity driven. It seems harder to get good grades.
Anonymous wrote:Usually called “standards based grading”, and no, it isn’t supposed to combat inflation, it’s supposed to give students a clearer picture of what they know/where they need help so they can better focus their efforts.
The issue is it takes 7593735392x as much organization on the part of the teacher to do it well, and if it’s only halfway implemented (so that unlimited retakes don’t materialize) it is hard to see the benefits of it.
Personally, as a high school math teacher I’m dreading this mandate coming down the pipeline because the logistics are a total nightmare.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter was complaining about her math grade last night. She has no idea what is going on with her grade; she said it looks like it's a B. Up until this year, she's been a straight A student with the exception of a B+ in AP Lang. She's a senior, and this has impacted what colleges are seeing. It's completely unfair. I can't believe that after everything these kids went through with Covid, and then having to play catch-up last year, that they are now having to deal with being part of this experiment.
I'm venting here, but my bigger concern is for my kid starting 9th grade next year. He is going to fail under this system. The rolling grade book in middle school has already been a disaster. It leads him to procrastinate and get behind.
Anonymous wrote:Or move. When businesses start going after FCPS they tend to listen more.