However, at its discretion, Appeals may reconsider its prior decision if evidence becomes available that indicates further consideration is warranted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I was in a very similar situation several years ago and decided to litigate. The IRS frequently lacks sufficient grounds and evidence for pursuing these sorts of cases. Moreover, there are countless precedent cases of this type that have been argued in favor of the defendants. Mine was dismissed and I was further awarded all legal fees and punitive damages to the tune of $5M. Absolutely you should push back on this! Will recommend my attorney, if you’re interested.
OP here.
Are you able to just post a website link here? (not really sure how I can get that info from you).
I just saw this on the IRS website:
However, at its discretion, Appeals may reconsider its prior decision if evidence becomes available that indicates further consideration is warranted.
Taxpayers may also pay the penalty previously upheld by Appeals and file a claim for refund. The claim for refund may be transferred to Appeals, if denied at the campus level.
I don't think my Tax Attorney provided the timeline showing my diligence to the Independent Office of Appeals. I remember the Tax Attorney saying that the timeline would be helpful for them "in case we have to go to the next stage." During the Appeals discussion, the Officer wanted to know the exact moment I realized I missed the deadline. I had that in my timeline but I am not sure if my documentation was provided.
I really appreciate the discussion here, you all. This thread is really motivating me to do more research. The more I dig in, the more I see that my case can be handled so much better- but it's one of those "how do you know when your doctor is good" kind of thing.
My Tax Attorney filed a form 843, and said that my CPA should have filed this first rather than writing a letter.
But now that I researched the form 843, it doesn't even look right to me.
I'm trying to read this article and thinking about clicking on the "let's chat" to get a 2nd opinion.. but it's late and I have to get to bed!
https://sftaxcounsel.com/bringing-the-3520-penalty-fight-to-the-irs-contesting-a-3520-penalty-in-tax-court/
Anonymous wrote:
OP here. Sorry I was silent for a bit... had to fix dinner, feed the family, clean the kitchen and pack lunches for tomorrow.
Re: The amount of the gift was $137k.. which would have been a non-taxable event had I just filed it on time. Should have been simple. Sigh!
Re: I remain concerned that your attorney told you that you had to pay the assessment before challenging in court (not true for Tax Court, but true for Court of Claims or for Federal District Court) and remain concerned that no one told you how the assessment was calculated.
I didn't jot it down in my notes but I seem to recall "court of claims" being mentioned.
I was told how it was assessed: penalty is the greater of $10,000 or 35% of the gross value received. $36,825 is the penalty. The remainder is the interest.
I really appreciate the thoughts put in this thread.
I wanted to think about how I am perceived by the IRS and the Office of Appeals.
The Office of Appeals Officer really zeroed in on me during the discussion and asked me a bunch of questions, after my Tax Attorney said that I will not be speaking and that in fact, their clients don't usually even attend hearings. I've been keeping my timeline/documentation because I've had to do so much of it between the letters written by the CPA and when I hired this Tax Attorney- but I didn't have any of my notes in front of me during the 15-minute teleconference. I got a really bad vibe after that call.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
On the 3520 form, it is category #4:
You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax year, received either:
More than $100,000 from a nonresident alien individual or a foreign estate (including foreign persons related to that nonresident alien individual or foreign estate) that you treated as gifts or bequests;
It was a gift from a sibling (who is not a US citizen and does not live in the US) from proceeds of land that he sold.
I went to 2 different CPAs prior to deciding to use the 3520 to make sure that it can be reported that way.
I have another sibling who received the same but submitted the form on the correct deadline.
The question that the 2 CPAs asked me was: did you receive money or did you receive land? I received money. If I received land, then the 3520 would not have been the right form to use.
Anonymous wrote:
OP here. Sorry I was silent for a bit... had to fix dinner, feed the family, clean the kitchen and pack lunches for tomorrow.
Re: The amount of the gift was $137k.. which would have been a non-taxable event had I just filed it on time. Should have been simple. Sigh!
Re: I remain concerned that your attorney told you that you had to pay the assessment before challenging in court (not true for Tax Court, but true for Court of Claims or for Federal District Court) and remain concerned that no one told you how the assessment was calculated.
I didn't jot it down in my notes but I seem to recall "court of claims" being mentioned.
I was told how it was assessed: penalty is the greater of $10,000 or 35% of the gross value received. $36,825 is the penalty. The remainder is the interest.
I really appreciate the thoughts put in this thread.
I wanted to think about how I am perceived by the IRS and the Office of Appeals.
The Office of Appeals Officer really zeroed in on me during the discussion and asked me a bunch of questions, after my Tax Attorney said that I will not be speaking and that in fact, their clients don't usually even attend hearings. I've been keeping my timeline/documentation because I've had to do so much of it between the letters written by the CPA and when I hired this Tax Attorney- but I didn't have any of my notes in front of me during the 15-minute teleconference. I got a really bad vibe after that call.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I was in a very similar situation several years ago and decided to litigate. The IRS frequently lacks sufficient grounds and evidence for pursuing these sorts of cases. Moreover, there are countless precedent cases of this type that have been argued in favor of the defendants. Mine was dismissed and I was further awarded all legal fees and punitive damages to the tune of $5M. Absolutely you should push back on this! Will recommend my attorney, if you’re interested.
Anonymous wrote:
Broadly, speaking, a second opinion might be in order since you wrote that your advisors had both made mistakes in this matter. I wonder if the way that they proceeded somehow locked you out of proceeding in Tax Court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it the 3250 to disclose a gift from a foreign person? Has there been any case law on this? If you go to litigation, is there a chance the IRS tax counsel will settle for less? Plus you will have your attorney’s fees. Is there a way your attorney can push back at Appeals? I can’t imagine that the Appeals Officer wants to have this go to litigation but who knows.
OP here. (I should say that at every response.. I can't figure out how to do multi quotes)
Yes, this is an FBAR and 3520 situation.
My Tax Attorney says that if we go to litigation, I first have to pay the $40k, but since litigation will force the IRS to have actual attorneys to review the case (rather than just CPAs), there's a 70% chance that I can get the full $40k back. If that happens, then I pay my Tax Attorney $9k for a success fee.
So it's a gamble. I have to front $40k to litigate. I can lose the entire $40k, or I can get everything back and pay $9k to the Tax Attorney.
The Tax Attorney can negotiate at Appeals. That's why I am crowd-sourcing advice here on how/what to negotiate.