Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I tip on the post tax amount. The difference is so trifling that I consider it mingy to do otherwise. And of course I tip on alcohol.
This is me as well.
There are some really embarrassing people in here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I teach my kids to move the decimal point on the total, multiply by 2, and round up. That's the baseline tip.
For all of you who insist on pretax tips, if the tax is 10%, the difference on a $100 bill is $2. If you go out for a $500 meal, the difference is $10.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
The actual tip convention is pre-tax. Your rational is that it’s not that much and you shame people at the end. C’mon. At least provide a logical reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. They are really snookering people with that!Anonymous wrote:I don’t eat out much, but, when I do, I don’t tip on the tax. And it drives me crazy when restaurants calculate the suggested tips (15%, 20%, etc.) based in the total sum of the bill—including tax.
Waiting on tables is a difficult job and most people do not make very much money and rely on tips. I cannot believe people on this thread are not tipping on tax, which for a $100 check would result in about an extra $1.50 in tip.
This logic has no end. Why not 25%? These people work hard. Why not 30%? They need the money more than I do. Why not 40%? It's hardly any more than 30%!
+1
It’s gotten insane. People won’t be able to afford to go out anymore. We’ve already had to limit eating out because of price increases. They’re going to run themselves out of business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. They are really snookering people with that!Anonymous wrote:I don’t eat out much, but, when I do, I don’t tip on the tax. And it drives me crazy when restaurants calculate the suggested tips (15%, 20%, etc.) based in the total sum of the bill—including tax.
Waiting on tables is a difficult job and most people do not make very much money and rely on tips. I cannot believe people on this thread are not tipping on tax, which for a $100 check would result in about an extra $1.50 in tip.
This logic has no end. Why not 25%? These people work hard. Why not 30%? They need the money more than I do. Why not 40%? It's hardly any more than 30%!
+1
It’s gotten insane. People won’t be able to afford to go out anymore. We’ve already had to limit eating out because of price increases. They’re going to run themselves out of business.
Anonymous wrote:I tip on the post tax amount. The difference is so trifling that I consider it mingy to do otherwise. And of course I tip on alcohol.
Anonymous wrote:I tip on the post tax amount. The difference is so trifling that I consider it mingy to do otherwise. And of course I tip on alcohol.
Anonymous wrote:I teach my kids to move the decimal point on the total, multiply by 2, and round up. That's the baseline tip.
For all of you who insist on pretax tips, if the tax is 10%, the difference on a $100 bill is $2. If you go out for a $500 meal, the difference is $10.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I teach my kids to move the decimal point on the total, multiply by 2, and round up. That's the baseline tip.
For all of you who insist on pretax tips, if the tax is 10%, the difference on a $100 bill is $2. If you go out for a $500 meal, the difference is $10.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Oh stop. Why don’t you tip 30%?
Sometimes I do, but that's a different discussion. We're not discussing the percentage at which you tip, but whether to tip on tax or not. Please try to keep up.
Also, please google the logical fallacy called the slippery slope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I teach my kids to move the decimal point on the total, multiply by 2, and round up. That's the baseline tip.
For all of you who insist on pretax tips, if the tax is 10%, the difference on a $100 bill is $2. If you go out for a $500 meal, the difference is $10.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Oh stop. Why don’t you tip 30%?