Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just arrived and is LOL’ing herself silly.
She's wearing her bright fuschia power suit so you can't miss her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for McCarthy but if has to give the store away, there is no point in being speaker.
Wouldn't it be "loverly" if GOPers have to get help from Dems to elect a speaker.
It wouldn't be surprising to me if the first few votes fail, and the Dems agree to vote Present so McCarthy can get over the threshold in return for some significant concessions in the rules package.
Yes, it would be nice for the Office of Congressional Ethics to still exist.
I think the concessions would have to be much more significant than that to get Dems on board.
Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just arrived and is LOL’ing herself silly.
Anonymous wrote:No matter who they eventually elect as Speaker, this dance will be repeated for every significant vote in the House for the next two years. A rump group of Republicans will oppose everything unless they get concessions that would not be acceptable to other Members. McCarthy or Scalise or whomever won’t be able to deliver enough Republican votes for anything that would pass the Senate and be signed by the President. The Speaker will be held hostage by the lunatics in the Republican caucus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for McCarthy but if has to give the store away, there is no point in being speaker.
Wouldn't it be "loverly" if GOPers have to get help from Dems to elect a speaker.
It wouldn't be surprising to me if the first few votes fail, and the Dems agree to vote Present so McCarthy can get over the threshold in return for some significant concessions in the rules package.
Yes, it would be nice for the Office of Congressional Ethics to still exist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for McCarthy but if has to give the store away, there is no point in being speaker.
Wouldn't it be "loverly" if GOPers have to get help from Dems to elect a speaker.
It wouldn't be surprising to me if the first few votes fail, and the Dems agree to vote Present so McCarthy can get over the threshold in return for some significant concessions in the rules package.
Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for McCarthy but if has to give the store away, there is no point in being speaker.
Wouldn't it be "loverly" if GOPers have to get help from Dems to elect a speaker.