Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a whole wide world between publishing and investment banking. How about psychology, public health, technical writing, or teaching? Not for profits are not all the same, and many of them (like mine) are practically indistinguishable from organizations that do the same work but take a profit. We pay market rate for researchers, financial analysts, software developers, managers, and strategy designers. Do I make a fortune? No. I make about $130 at age 50. But it is plenty, and I don’t give a hoot about being rich. I have enough, and I have a job that gives me meaning. Young people can have that, too. They should of course know what the jobs they are considering pay, though, so they aren’t blindsided.
What jobs are there in “psychology?” Even private practice psychologists have relatively low salaries and tons of student debt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an alumni mentor for my college (an Ivy FWIW), and I keep seeing a misconception among the college students I’m assigned to mentee — that your job/career will bring you meaning or fulfillment in life.
For example, I was recently paired with a sophomore from my college who was in the same major as me (English). I’m guessing she’s from a low income background as her Linkedin says that she’s a Questbridge student. She reached out to me and asked for suggestions on careers for an English major that don’t require law school — I suggested software sales (my career), corporate communications, management consulting, and investment banking (the last two being more achievable if she double majors in Econ).
She told me that these options sounded “soul-sucking and depressing,” and that she was hoping to go into journalism or publishing. I told her that those are fields only for rich kids — poor kids like her shouldn’t touch those with a ten-foot pole.
I don’t understand why this generation expects work to be meaningful or fulfilling. Work is a way to make money for all but the wealthy. So why the navel-gazing and entitlement?
Part of the privilege of going to an Ivy is the ability to get a job that makes a ton of money while also being meaningful and fulfilling. That you haven’t figured this out for yourself makes you a poor alumni mentor. I hope this student realizes this and finds a better mentor.
Anonymous wrote:I’m an alumni mentor for my college (an Ivy FWIW), and I keep seeing a misconception among the college students I’m assigned to mentee — that your job/career will bring you meaning or fulfillment in life.
For example, I was recently paired with a sophomore from my college who was in the same major as me (English). I’m guessing she’s from a low income background as her Linkedin says that she’s a Questbridge student. She reached out to me and asked for suggestions on careers for an English major that don’t require law school — I suggested software sales (my career), corporate communications, management consulting, and investment banking (the last two being more achievable if she double majors in Econ).
She told me that these options sounded “soul-sucking and depressing,” and that she was hoping to go into journalism or publishing. I told her that those are fields only for rich kids — poor kids like her shouldn’t touch those with a ten-foot pole.
I don’t understand why this generation expects work to be meaningful or fulfilling. Work is a way to make money for all but the wealthy. So why the navel-gazing and entitlement?
Anonymous wrote:Work is the 'place' where you spend far and away most of your waking hours, week in/week out
"Why does't everyone want to spend the majority of their time dying inside, I wonder?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think living without the means to support yourself sounds way more soul sucking than investment banking or comms. I don’t understand why some people don’t actually consider the amount of money they feel they need in order to live the life they want. I think students need to focus on that aspect a little more when making career decisions.
That student has no idea what an UMC life costs. The numbers for salaries would sound made up (think Dr Evil and asking for $1B in 1960)
+1
Let me guess, she’s a scholarship kid at an Ivy from a rural area, right?
Hah, my experience too. I was making more than my parents house was worth at my NPO job, I thought I had made it ($50k, snicker)
This is what people who say "those jobs are only for trust fund kids" don't get: the frame of reference of the people they're speaking to.
Anonymous wrote:There is a whole wide world between publishing and investment banking. How about psychology, public health, technical writing, or teaching? Not for profits are not all the same, and many of them (like mine) are practically indistinguishable from organizations that do the same work but take a profit. We pay market rate for researchers, financial analysts, software developers, managers, and strategy designers. Do I make a fortune? No. I make about $130 at age 50. But it is plenty, and I don’t give a hoot about being rich. I have enough, and I have a job that gives me meaning. Young people can have that, too. They should of course know what the jobs they are considering pay, though, so they aren’t blindsided.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This post hits home! I’ve find it really hard to mentor students. I totally understand wanting to do fulfilling work. I like my job. It’s good work and I help people. AND, I like that I can afford to make 3-4 international vacations a year and enjoy fine dining etc.
I make $187k + bonus (single. No kids and I’m 38). Along the way, I took some jobs that were not great, but gave me skills I need to keep progressing. Those jobs (ie budget analyst) sucked, but I chose to see the positive and knew it was just a stop along the way.
My sister refused to “sell her soul.” She make $60k with a kid and struggles. She can’t do ANYTHING. Even a pedicure is a tough spend for her. She has to go on a 18 month payment plan for a 4 day vacation at some 3 star resort in the Bahamas or our dad pays. More often than not, dad pays.
Just curious, what is your job and what has your career path looked like? Also, just curious, why do you need a high paying job if you don’t have any kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This post hits home! I’ve find it really hard to mentor students. I totally understand wanting to do fulfilling work. I like my job. It’s good work and I help people. AND, I like that I can afford to make 3-4 international vacations a year and enjoy fine dining etc.
I make $187k + bonus (single. No kids and I’m 38). Along the way, I took some jobs that were not great, but gave me skills I need to keep progressing. Those jobs (ie budget analyst) sucked, but I chose to see the positive and knew it was just a stop along the way.
My sister refused to “sell her soul.” She make $60k with a kid and struggles. She can’t do ANYTHING. Even a pedicure is a tough spend for her. She has to go on a 18 month payment plan for a 4 day vacation at some 3 star resort in the Bahamas or our dad pays. More often than not, dad pays.
I work at a nonprofit and several folks make more than $200k. You can have both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think living without the means to support yourself sounds way more soul sucking than investment banking or comms. I don’t understand why some people don’t actually consider the amount of money they feel they need in order to live the life they want. I think students need to focus on that aspect a little more when making career decisions.
That student has no idea what an UMC life costs. The numbers for salaries would sound made up (think Dr Evil and asking for $1B in 1960)
+1
Let me guess, she’s a scholarship kid at an Ivy from a rural area, right?
Hah, my experience too. I was making more than my parents house was worth at my NPO job, I thought I had made it ($50k, snicker)
This is what people who say "those jobs are only for trust fund kids" don't get: the frame of reference of the people they're speaking to.
Anonymous wrote:Because from Gen X on people have been shoveling the BS message that if you do what you love the money will come so people expect to basketweave or chant and become independently wealthy. Work is to provide income. If you enjoy it you are lucky, but ultimately it is to provide income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think living without the means to support yourself sounds way more soul sucking than investment banking or comms. I don’t understand why some people don’t actually consider the amount of money they feel they need in order to live the life they want. I think students need to focus on that aspect a little more when making career decisions.
That student has no idea what an UMC life costs. The numbers for salaries would sound made up (think Dr Evil and asking for $1B in 1960)
+1
Let me guess, she’s a scholarship kid at an Ivy from a rural area, right?
Hah, my experience too. I was making more than my parents house was worth at my NPO job, I thought I had made it ($50k, snicker)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think living without the means to support yourself sounds way more soul sucking than investment banking or comms. I don’t understand why some people don’t actually consider the amount of money they feel they need in order to live the life they want. I think students need to focus on that aspect a little more when making career decisions.
That student has no idea what an UMC life costs. The numbers for salaries would sound made up (think Dr Evil and asking for $1B in 1960)
+1
Let me guess, she’s a scholarship kid at an Ivy from a rural area, right?