Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a much younger sister in her early thirties and she and nearly all of her friends are SAHM’s to men working good professional jobs. Looking at the housing turnover in my neighborhood this seems to be the case there too. So I’m not sure if your theory is accurate.
I think it also depends where you live but ultimately, the high earning lawyer plus high earning cardiologist will do better overall financially and have the most resources of their kids. In the end, I can see this being the ideal set up.
You think a kid being raised by a big law partner and a busy specialist doctor is the ideal set up? Those people are going to need a backup nanny for the main nanny, so we are gonna have to agree to disagree there.
Yeah in the families that I know with 2 busy high earning parents, the kids aren’t getting a lot of attention.
Can't have two really busy parents. Kids suffer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not just that, really “Type A” women tend to stay more fit.
It’s this
In Italy, where being fit and thin has way less to do with socioeconomics, no one cares if you are “high earning”.
Being a hot sahm is the dream/goal.
In anglo countries, due to body weight being linked to socio-economic status, interest in professional women is greater because professional women are less sloppy
As someone who used to live in Italy, I find your bizarre statement here fascinating. It is clear you’ve never stepped foot in the country.
By the way, many Italian women do not want to marry Italian men at all. It’s actually a big problem there. And no, very few Italian women want to be SAHMs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not just that, really “Type A” women tend to stay more fit.
It’s this
In Italy, where being fit and thin has way less to do with socioeconomics, no one cares if you are “high earning”.
Being a hot sahm is the dream/goal.
In anglo countries, due to body weight being linked to socio-economic status, interest in professional women is greater because professional women are less sloppy
Of course a ‘hot sahm’ is the dream/goal in Italy. It’s one of the least egalitarian countries in Europe. You need to look at the Scandinavian countries for gender equality. There are not looking for hot SAHMs over there.
Anonymous wrote:I work with wealthy men, and yea, that’s exactly what everyone wants now.
Ideal is to find some sort of Influencer, so she’s hot, has money, and doesn’t work a ton of hours.
Anonymous wrote:Men asking women to bring "something" to the relationship other than open legs. I see nothing wrong with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not just that, really “Type A” women tend to stay more fit.
It’s this
In Italy, where being fit and thin has way less to do with socioeconomics, no one cares if you are “high earning”.
Being a hot sahm is the dream/goal.
In anglo countries, due to body weight being linked to socio-economic status, interest in professional women is greater because professional women are less sloppy
Of course a ‘hot sahm’ is the dream/goal in Italy. It’s one of the least egalitarian countries in Europe. You need to look at the Scandinavian countries for gender equality. There are not looking for hot SAHMs over there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not just that, really “Type A” women tend to stay more fit.
It’s this
In Italy, where being fit and thin has way less to do with socioeconomics, no one cares if you are “high earning”.
Being a hot sahm is the dream/goal.
In anglo countries, due to body weight being linked to socio-economic status, interest in professional women is greater because professional women are less sloppy
Anonymous wrote:I've noticed with group of friends that men now are interested in high income women w/ high earning potential vs being with a traditional idea of a woman who wants to stay home while they earn the money. Many of my physician female friends are in high demand and all engaged or married to other physicians, engineers, lawyers, etc, despite working tons of hours and not being "available". If you think about it, this allows for more resources and a better lifestyle than a single income household. One can easily afford a nanny and housekeeper with these dual income professional salaries while still saving for retirement, college, traveling, paying private school, etc so this trumps the SAHM/breadwinner paradigm financially. It also protects against the potential swings of the economy. I grew up hearing that men wanted a "hot" wife that was attractive and available with no though to their earning potential. I think this has changed...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the ‘20s. Men are absolutely looking for high wage earning women. Women have been seeking out men who earn more for century, it should be no surprise that ultimately men we’re going to do the same.
Welcome to the mid but we’re in the mid 20s, ladies!
The big question is whether or not men are now going to do half the childcare, cooking, and housework. Based on my observations it seems like marriage has less and less to offer women, but we shall see.
Many men actually do the majority of the house work, and looking after the kids. This is not new.
Also, it just makes sense to get a nanny for $20 an hour to look after your children while you are at work making much much more and a housekeeper to clean your house for 100 bucks a week. Many women use the argument that they have to take care of the home and the kids as an excuse to not work and capitalize on there early capacity, but they could be making much earn more money and just using daycare.
The nanny can never really replicate what a parent does. And I know there are some very good nannies out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a much younger sister in her early thirties and she and nearly all of her friends are SAHM’s to men working good professional jobs. Looking at the housing turnover in my neighborhood this seems to be the case there too. So I’m not sure if your theory is accurate.
I think it also depends where you live but ultimately, the high earning lawyer plus high earning cardiologist will do better overall financially and have the most resources of their kids. In the end, I can see this being the ideal set up.
You think a kid being raised by a big law partner and a busy specialist doctor is the ideal set up? Those people are going to need a backup nanny for the main nanny, so we are gonna have to agree to disagree there.
Yeah in the families that I know with 2 busy high earning parents, the kids aren’t getting a lot of attention.