Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry but this is really poor journalism. Let’s be clear— the books were met with overwhelming support….from the LGBTQ+ community. Not the entire MCPS community despite the “robust” evaluation. This is a very sensitive topic for many. The article states those who disagree with this decision are living in fear, which just smacks of bias and ostracism (and yes, irony). People have a lot of different feelings about how this should be presented to children and that should have been respected if we are really going to be inclusive.
Completely agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really happy to see this. Thanks for posting, OP.
Why are you happy to see this in schools?
These books are available at public libraries and parents are welcome to buy them if they so choose.
Why do you see the need to have these books available in elementary schools?
I'm confused. So elementary schools should only have books that public libraries don't have and parents can't buy?
Nothing to be confused about this poster is an idiot. Book banning ignorant. Her kids will never amount to anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really happy to see this. Thanks for posting, OP.
Why are you happy to see this in schools?
These books are available at public libraries and parents are welcome to buy them if they so choose.
Why do you see the need to have these books available in elementary schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support it as a 2 mom family. Be nice for my kid and my kids friends to see our type of family on a book in the classroom. It’s a shame it’s only one book per grade and the teachers aren’t “ required” to read it though. Originally it was supposed to be 2 books per grade and the teachers weee getting training on incorporating them into classroom learning. So while it’s a step in the right direction. It’s a very small step.
Now admin can blame teachers if kids aren't introduced to LGBTQ issues in ES.
Keep that crap at home. Hetro, Homo, Bi whatever a second grader does not to read a book Suzie has two moms and her two moms have vibrators
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support it as a 2 mom family. Be nice for my kid and my kids friends to see our type of family on a book in the classroom. It’s a shame it’s only one book per grade and the teachers aren’t “ required” to read it though. Originally it was supposed to be 2 books per grade and the teachers weee getting training on incorporating them into classroom learning. So while it’s a step in the right direction. It’s a very small step.
Now admin can blame teachers if kids aren't introduced to LGBTQ issues in ES.
Keep that crap at home. Hetro, Homo, Bi whatever a second grader does not to read a book Suzie has two moms and her two moms have vibrators
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support it as a 2 mom family. Be nice for my kid and my kids friends to see our type of family on a book in the classroom. It’s a shame it’s only one book per grade and the teachers aren’t “ required” to read it though. Originally it was supposed to be 2 books per grade and the teachers weee getting training on incorporating them into classroom learning. So while it’s a step in the right direction. It’s a very small step.
Now admin can blame teachers if kids aren't introduced to LGBTQ issues in ES.
Anonymous wrote:I support it as a 2 mom family. Be nice for my kid and my kids friends to see our type of family on a book in the classroom. It’s a shame it’s only one book per grade and the teachers aren’t “ required” to read it though. Originally it was supposed to be 2 books per grade and the teachers weee getting training on incorporating them into classroom learning. So while it’s a step in the right direction. It’s a very small step.
the percentages aren’t actually relevant. What’s relevant is that kids can see families like theirs in their school. Doesn’t matter if it’s only one kid in the entire grade. It matters to that one kid.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone here want to read "the classics" when they were in school? Curriculum and media center development has moved light years beyond when we were in school. Were the classics even ever relevant???
What does this mean? Captain Underpants?
Yes, I wanted to read A Little Princess, Heidi, Little House on the Prairie, etc.
Tell us what you mean about curriculum moving light years beyond...
Those books are still available! It's not like "the classics" have been purged from MCPS media centers. More books have been added. That's good! I want kids with two dads to feel just as represented in literature as kids who live on the side of a mountain in Switzerland with their grumpy grandfather.
You aren't responding to the same thing that I was responding to. But, so we can discuss... there were 114,000 same sex couples raising kids in the U.S. in 2016 (latest I saw in my quick look-up) out of 34.2 million families with children in that year. So, "just as represented" should be... not much. Equals 0.00351851851
https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/employment-in-families-with-children-in-2016.htm
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/same-sex-parents-us/
(And, I really doubt that very many MCPS classrooms have the books cited above.)
they’re not religious book. Why would they? It’s a totally different genre.Anonymous wrote:Do those “inclusive books” include the Bible? Koran?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone here want to read "the classics" when they were in school? Curriculum and media center development has moved light years beyond when we were in school. Were the classics even ever relevant???
What does this mean? Captain Underpants?
Yes, I wanted to read A Little Princess, Heidi, Little House on the Prairie, etc.
Tell us what you mean about curriculum moving light years beyond...
Those books are still available! It's not like "the classics" have been purged from MCPS media centers. More books have been added. That's good! I want kids with two dads to feel just as represented in literature as kids who live on the side of a mountain in Switzerland with their grumpy grandfather.
You aren't responding to the same thing that I was responding to. But, so we can discuss... there were 114,000 same sex couples raising kids in the U.S. in 2016 (latest I saw in my quick look-up) out of 34.2 million families with children in that year. So, "just as represented" should be... not much. Equals 0.00351851851
https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/employment-in-families-with-children-in-2016.htm
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/same-sex-parents-us/
(And, I really doubt that very many MCPS classrooms have the books cited above.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone here want to read "the classics" when they were in school? Curriculum and media center development has moved light years beyond when we were in school. Were the classics even ever relevant???
What does this mean? Captain Underpants?
Yes, I wanted to read A Little Princess, Heidi, Little House on the Prairie, etc.
Tell us what you mean about curriculum moving light years beyond...
Those books are still available! It's not like "the classics" have been purged from MCPS media centers. More books have been added. That's good! I want kids with two dads to feel just as represented in literature as kids who live on the side of a mountain in Switzerland with their grumpy grandfather.
You aren't responding to the same thing that I was responding to. But, so we can discuss... there were 114,000 same sex couples raising kids in the U.S. in 2016 (latest I saw in my quick look-up) out of 34.2 million families with children in that year. So, "just as represented" should be... not much. Equals 0.00351851851
https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/employment-in-families-with-children-in-2016.htm
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/same-sex-parents-us/
(And, I really doubt that very many MCPS classrooms have the books cited above.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone here want to read "the classics" when they were in school? Curriculum and media center development has moved light years beyond when we were in school. Were the classics even ever relevant???
What does this mean? Captain Underpants?
Yes, I wanted to read A Little Princess, Heidi, Little House on the Prairie, etc.
Tell us what you mean about curriculum moving light years beyond...
Those books are still available! It's not like "the classics" have been purged from MCPS media centers. More books have been added. That's good! I want kids with two dads to feel just as represented in literature as kids who live on the side of a mountain in Switzerland with their grumpy grandfather.