Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone followed the actual legal claims about termination and ownership of the company? A little hard to follow when it’s presented from her POV. He owned the company, made her CEO, promised half (but then a court determined she didn’t have half?). I haven’t finished the season yet, but just wondering.
They signed paperwork to become 50-50 co owners. The paperwork was legally signed, but never filed in the state of Delaware, where the business was incorporated. That nullifies and voids the agreement. It leaves her with less than 1% of the company, not the 50% she was under the impression she owned. Whether this was intentional or a mistake is to be determined. They have several lawsuits around it that are ongoing and will be for a bit longer. I cannot see the suits finding in her favor because the paperwork was never filed. I also cannot understand how, during the past few years, and never came to her attention, or anybody’s attention at board meetings, or when any other major decisions were made for the company, like plans to incorporate, that she was not a stakeholder (or one with more than 1%).
Anonymous wrote:I just finished this season and my opinion of her has gone way down.
No boundaries with her children - she seems to lean on them for emotional support and want to control their lives.
Her weight is scary. And I agree with PP that she seems to think she looks great. She looks like a scarecrow. Her clothes would be wildly inappropriate/unflattering even if she was a healthy weight - but that scene of her dancing in the go-go shorts was disturbing.
And hooking up with the 23 year old? Super cringey.
All the talk of their start up seemed super simplistic and unprofessional as though it was all fake. Makes me wonder what she did at Silvio's company. The idea of making her 22 year old daughter the CIO is also crazy. It's a head scratcher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the way she dealt w her religious son was super fair and a good tone. Was reasonable but firm. Solid parenting
Totally agree. And I really hope she’s able to build her women’s home with support services.
I was impressed with this too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone followed the actual legal claims about termination and ownership of the company? A little hard to follow when it’s presented from her POV. He owned the company, made her CEO, promised half (but then a court determined she didn’t have half?). I haven’t finished the season yet, but just wondering.
They signed paperwork to become 50-50 co owners. The paperwork was legally signed, but never filed in the state of Delaware, where the business was incorporated. That nullifies and voids the agreement. It leaves her with less than 1% of the company, not the 50% she was under the impression she owned. Whether this was intentional or a mistake is to be determined. They have several lawsuits around it that are ongoing and will be for a bit longer. I cannot see the suits finding in her favor because the paperwork was never filed. I also cannot understand how, during the past few years, and never came to her attention, or anybody’s attention at board meetings, or when any other major decisions were made for the company, like plans to incorporate, that she was not a stakeholder (or one with more than 1%).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the way she dealt w her religious son was super fair and a good tone. Was reasonable but firm. Solid parenting
Totally agree. And I really hope she’s able to build her women’s home with support services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone followed the actual legal claims about termination and ownership of the company? A little hard to follow when it’s presented from her POV. He owned the company, made her CEO, promised half (but then a court determined she didn’t have half?). I haven’t finished the season yet, but just wondering.
They signed paperwork to become 50-50 co owners. The paperwork was legally signed, but never filed in the state of Delaware, where the business was incorporated. That nullifies and voids the agreement. It leaves her with less than 1% of the company, not the 50% she was under the impression she owned. Whether this was intentional or a mistake is to be determined. They have several lawsuits around it that are ongoing and will be for a bit longer. I cannot see the suits finding in her favor because the paperwork was never filed. I also cannot understand how, during the past few years, and never came to her attention, or anybody’s attention at board meetings, or when any other major decisions were made for the company, like plans to incorporate, that she was not a stakeholder (or one with more than 1%).
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone followed the actual legal claims about termination and ownership of the company? A little hard to follow when it’s presented from her POV. He owned the company, made her CEO, promised half (but then a court determined she didn’t have half?). I haven’t finished the season yet, but just wondering.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly the way she dealt w her religious son was super fair and a good tone. Was reasonable but firm. Solid parenting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Silvio's new fiancee's website: https://www.oldfashionedmom.org/
It is a throw back to 2010
I cab’t understand what’s happening with this website…
Also, it’s odd that Silvio is dating a woman with young kids. Does he expect them to parent themselves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Silvio's new fiancee's website: https://www.oldfashionedmom.org/
It is a throw back to 2010
Her children are Hudson and Hyacinth. Of course they are.