Anonymous wrote:I take issue with posters claiming a cause and effect relationship between less demand for law students in the early 2000s and the rise in merit aid. I think, and apparently the law schools dropping out of US news agree, that it’s the pressure to enroll students with sky high LSAT scores to maintain and bring up their ranking that’s led to the bidding war.
The worst example is Wash U. It buys law students more than just about any other top 25 school, and year after year it climbs the rankings. Schools like it are gonna take a hit if the rankings become less important. There’s no way Wash U is as good of a law school as its current ranking would suggest. It’s not Vanderbilt, Texas or UCLA for Pete’s sake. Cut me a break.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Maybe 20 years ago, but they do now. Maybe not Harvard and Yale, but Harvard cited the practice as a reason it was pulling out of the USNWR rankings (meaning its competitors are doing it and they were feeling the pressure to do it, too).
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/decision-to-withdraw-from-the-u-s-news-world-report-process/
Second, by heavily weighting students’ test scores and college grades, the U.S. News rankings have over the years created incentives for law schools to direct more financial aid toward applicants based on their LSAT scores and college GPAs without regard to their financial need. Though HLS and YLS have each resisted the pull toward so-called merit aid, it has become increasingly prevalent, absorbing scarce resources that could be allocated more directly on the basis of need.
That’s not what Dean Manning is saying at all (your claim that he addressed merit aid). Merit aid is given at the beginning of the law school career (and hopefully continued for the next two years to offset tuition. . What Dean Manning and the Yale Dean are referring to is their objections as to how USNWR calculated Harvard’s own financing of student careers in low-income public service careers -after they graduate. Harvard Law does not give merit aid.
As to the second point, yes, some of the lower ranked schools have given merit aid in exchange for high lsat and GPAs. But Harvard does not
Nope. Harvard doesn't give merit aid. You could google:
HLS does not award “merit” or “full-ride” scholarships (which typically are not need-based) because doing so would decrease the resources available for need-based aid, and significantly increase the debt burden of every financially needy student.
The Need-Based Aid Philosophy - Harvard Law School
Anonymous wrote:Whatever he does, don’t take out large loans for a third tier law school. If he can go to a tip law school, he should be able to pay off his loans easily.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's unclear what effect the recent actions of Yale & others re: not cooperating with USNWR will have on this, but, in the past, law schools have been very sensitive to rankings & compete for the highest GPAs & LSAT scores. It's not like undergraduate where you only get merit for schools that are lower ranked than the schools you're qualified for.
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
FWIW, I think the rankings will continue to matter because USNWR can get the data they need from other sources, and no matter what Yale et al say, they don't want to drop in the rankings.
Interesting. In the early 90s, I had 99th percentile LSAT score and spouse had a perfect Lsat score, we both had graduated undergrad from ivies, and neither of us were offerred merit aid from any law school. We both attended GW, fwiw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Maybe 20 years ago, but they do now. Maybe not Harvard and Yale, but Harvard cited the practice as a reason it was pulling out of the USNWR rankings (meaning its competitors are doing it and they were feeling the pressure to do it, too).
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/decision-to-withdraw-from-the-u-s-news-world-report-process/
Second, by heavily weighting students’ test scores and college grades, the U.S. News rankings have over the years created incentives for law schools to direct more financial aid toward applicants based on their LSAT scores and college GPAs without regard to their financial need. Though HLS and YLS have each resisted the pull toward so-called merit aid, it has become increasingly prevalent, absorbing scarce resources that could be allocated more directly on the basis of need.
That’s not what Dean Manning is saying at all (your claim that he addressed merit aid). Merit aid is given at the beginning of the law school career (and hopefully continued for the next two years to offset tuition. . What Dean Manning and the Yale Dean are referring to is their objections as to how USNWR calculated Harvard’s own financing of student careers in low-income public service careers -after they graduate. Harvard Law does not give merit aid.
As to the second point, yes, some of the lower ranked schools have given merit aid in exchange for high lsat and GPAs. But Harvard does not
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Maybe 20 years ago, but they do now. Maybe not Harvard and Yale, but Harvard cited the practice as a reason it was pulling out of the USNWR rankings (meaning its competitors are doing it and they were feeling the pressure to do it, too).
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/decision-to-withdraw-from-the-u-s-news-world-report-process/
Second, by heavily weighting students’ test scores and college grades, the U.S. News rankings have over the years created incentives for law schools to direct more financial aid toward applicants based on their LSAT scores and college GPAs without regard to their financial need. Though HLS and YLS have each resisted the pull toward so-called merit aid, it has become increasingly prevalent, absorbing scarce resources that could be allocated more directly on the basis of need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Maybe 20 years ago, but they do now. Maybe not Harvard and Yale, but Harvard cited the practice as a reason it was pulling out of the USNWR rankings (meaning its competitors are doing it and they were feeling the pressure to do it, too).
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/decision-to-withdraw-from-the-u-s-news-world-report-process/
Second, by heavily weighting students’ test scores and college grades, the U.S. News rankings have over the years created incentives for law schools to direct more financial aid toward applicants based on their LSAT scores and college GPAs without regard to their financial need. Though HLS and YLS have each resisted the pull toward so-called merit aid, it has become increasingly prevalent, absorbing scarce resources that could be allocated more directly on the basis of need.
Anonymous wrote:The top 3 ranked (Yale, Stanford, & Harvard) do not give merit scholarships--just need based financial aid.
Almost all other law schools offer merit scholarship awards of varying amounts to applicants with above median stats (LAST and/or GPA).
Some law schools state that once an award is offered, that the school will not negotiate the amount of the merit award, while other schools do enter into bidding wars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can also work at a university and get reduced tuition at law school. I know someone who graduated Georgetown Law this way.
In the 90's, many schools were free.
Now, you have to work there a minimum number of years (several) for partial tuition decrease, and there is no longer total tuition decrease - unless you have worked there for decades, and are grandfathered in.
I think there is a common misconception that what was true in the 90's (free school!) is true now. It is most definitely not.
This. Georgetown used to have very generous tuition benefits for employees and their children but this has been reduced through the years. I believe only grandfathered employees who started more than 15 years ago get the most generous benefits now.
Georgetown >> 1 year. 90% of tuiton.
https://benefits.georgetown.edu/announcements/tap-eligibility-change/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.
The T14 don’t do this. Less elite schools will pay for a high GPA or LSAT but the top don’t because they don’t have to.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting that they got into a bidding war. Yet Imsaw on r/lawschooladmissions that a candidate had her offer rescinded when she tried to negotiate with UCLA for better merit aid.Anonymous wrote:
A top law school will provide merit for a kid with top LSAT scores. I've helped my law school recruit top students and have seen law schools basically get into a bidding war over the amount of aid available.