Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
This. And they do shift work.
Yup. But DCUMers lose their damn minds every time this is suggested when they complain they can’t afford childcare.
“But…but….I’m ENTITLED to make 6+ figures at a cushy desk job, only on the schedule I prefer, and I simply *cannot* work opposite shifts with my spouse to save on childcare anyway, because I must spend every waking moment with my spouse fOr mY mEnTaL hEaLtH.”![]()
OK, then find a way to pay for that childcare and quit whining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
This. And they do shift work.
Anonymous wrote:DP and here is another snippet
"Biden’s Build Back Better legislation would have provided universal preschool for all 3- and 4-year-olds and expanded access to high-quality child care for low- and middle-income children."
Thank god this legislation did not pass and no one should ever think this is some great idea or vote for it. It's a truly terrible idea that would make daycare instantly more expensive for those in the DC area. If you think your daycare bill is large now, expect it to triple if something like this were to pass.
It shows how misguided lawmakers are regarding what daycare is and what is needed.
3 and 4 yrs old are relatively cheap for daycares and the cost for that can be less. Strip that away and daycare centers are left with the costly infant and toddler rooms that require several staff to cover all shifts and can only accommodate a small number of kids. Centers like those wouldn't even be able break even unless they started charging more. A lot more.
And daycare is needed for infants and toddlers as well NOT just 3 years and up.
We are still wanting to cling to the belief that it is 1950 and daycare is extraneous. What we have to do and what politicians have to do is accept it is reality - just like K-12 school. And that's what has to happen. There has to be a public portion of all daycare centers to subsidize the cost of all daycares across the county. Teachers have to be paid similar to public school teachers and there has to be public money plus private pay money.
The idea that only low income parents need child care subsidies also has to go away. Subsidies have to extend to families that are in middle incomes for their specific area - not a national average. In DC, I would argue that families of 3 - two adults, one kid - making up to $175K likely need a subsidy in order to not be drowning each month.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
This. And they do shift work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a classic case of Millennial navel-gazing. When it was happening to Gen-X parents no one cared. But now that it's happening to millennials it's a huge deal that warrants hand-wringing and media coverage.
I know wayyyy more Gen X couples who could afford for one parent to stay home than Millennials. The spike in housing costs has been no joke for family planning and budgeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.
Most people under a certain income bracket don’t pay for daycare. They hav family members watch the kids or older siblings watch the kids.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that 45K for two kids sounds reasonable does not obviate the problem that it’s unaffordable for most. Unless we only want Rich people having kids (and workers earning peanuts) we need a better solution.