Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this just at some schools? I’ve read at others applicants are way down.
Applicants have been down, even pre covid at many schools outside of the T50/T60. Class of 2022 was the largest class and itisgoing down from there. Schools have been planning for this and the continued dropoff over the next 5-10 years. So the T20-40 wont be affected, others will
I think this is part of the reason they’re all so crunched right now. No one wants to expand with a population drop off on the horizon. I agree the top schools are less affected by the population cliff, but any T20-40 school that expands will drop in the rankings.
The universities don't want to expand because they don't have the resources. Add 500 kids to your freshman class and by time they are seniors you have 2000 more students on campus. Is there space in all facilities (dorms/library/classrooms/dining/etc)? Can classes still be small sizes? Answer to that is no. Just look at many T50 schools who have had slightly larger classes the past 2-3 years (as in 200 students or so) and see the impacts on housing alone. I wouldn't want my kid at a school that adds students without adding infratstructure first.
While private universities have been changing very little in size over the past 25 years as the population of applicants has exploded, public universities have been happy to pick up the extra students. JMU, for example, has doubled in size during that time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this just at some schools? I’ve read at others applicants are way down.
Applicants have been down, even pre covid at many schools outside of the T50/T60. Class of 2022 was the largest class and itisgoing down from there. Schools have been planning for this and the continued dropoff over the next 5-10 years. So the T20-40 wont be affected, others will
I think this is part of the reason they’re all so crunched right now. No one wants to expand with a population drop off on the horizon. I agree the top schools are less affected by the population cliff, but any T20-40 school that expands will drop in the rankings.
The universities don't want to expand because they don't have the resources. Add 500 kids to your freshman class and by time they are seniors you have 2000 more students on campus. Is there space in all facilities (dorms/library/classrooms/dining/etc)? Can classes still be small sizes? Answer to that is no. Just look at many T50 schools who have had slightly larger classes the past 2-3 years (as in 200 students or so) and see the impacts on housing alone. I wouldn't want my kid at a school that adds students without adding infratstructure first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Bring back the tests!! It's the only way to stop this madness.
For the most part, unless you're applying to University of California colleges, the tests are STILL here - just optional for most schools. Feel free to take the test.
If you mean revert back to making tests mandatory, that ain't happening.
The UCs and CSUs are test blind, not test optional. Can you explain what you are referring to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Bring back the tests!! It's the only way to stop this madness.
For the most part, unless you're applying to University of California colleges, the tests are STILL here - just optional for most schools. Feel free to take the test.
If you mean revert back to making tests mandatory, that ain't happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Bring back the tests!! It's the only way to stop this madness.
For the most part, unless you're applying to University of California colleges, the tests are STILL here - just optional for most schools. Feel free to take the test.
If you mean revert back to making tests mandatory, that ain't happening.